Friday, November 13, 2009

Socializing has become the first internet usage



According to the Ruder Finn Intent Index, more than 4 in 5 people (80%) go online to socialize, which is twice as many as those who go online to shop or do business. Online business isn’t dead but marketers who can’t connect with their consumers’ intent do so at their own peril.

Complete article here
http://www.ruderfinn.com/about/news/rf-s-new-study-of.html

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

Right People fund raising

As we are 200% dedicated to close the current fund raising, here is a video recently taken during our current extended roadshow.

It describes the new precise and powerful positionning of Right People.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

social networks are so popular that employers are banning them from workplaces


According to a study commissioned by Robert Half Technology, an IT staffing firm, 54% of U.S. companies say that they have banned workers from using social networking sites like Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn and MySpace while on the job. The study, released today, also found that 19% of companies allow social networking use only for business purposes, while 16% allow limited personal use.
Only 10% of the 1,400 CIOs interviewed said that their companies allow employees full access to social networks during work hours.
"Using social networking sites may divert employees' attention away from more pressing priorities, so it's understandable that some companies limit access," said Dave Willmer, executive director of Robert Half Technology and a Computerworld columnist, in a statement. "For some professions, however, these sites can be leveraged as effective business tools, which may be why about one in five companies allows their use for work-related purposes."
A study released last summer concluded that social networking use could hurt the bottom line.
Nucleus Research, an IT research firm, reported in July that employee productivity drops 1.5% at companies that allow full access to Facebook in the workplace. That survey of 237 corporate employees also showed that 77% of workers who have a Facebook account use it during work hours.
Nucleus said that the survey found that "some" employees use the social networking site for as much as two hours a day at work. It did not say how many workers fit into that category, but it did note that one in 33 workers surveyed said that they use Facebook only while at work. And of those using Facebook at work, 87% said they had no clear business reason for accessing the network.
And in August, the U.S. Marine Corps reaffirmed its ban on the use of social networks by its soldiers.

Saturday, October 10, 2009

facebook-twitter battle



Showing that new smart features can bring a new social media system chalenging an existing well established one.


Facebook has a problem. One of its main goals now is to be the center for sharing everything on the web, but the key to that is to make the process as quick and easy as possible. And in that regard, its rival Twitter destroys it. That’s a problem.

Now, Facebook isn’t in any immediate danger because of this, it can coast on its sheer size (300 million users). But eventually, if those users find their way to Twitter, I would bet that they’ll start sharing more there, because it’s just so much easier. And while ease and speed may be what the user cares about, traffic is what publishers care about. And despite being much larger, Facebook also loses that battle to Twitter.

A Tale Of Two Buttons

The reason I bring this up is because this weekend, TechCrunch installed a new Facebook Share button on every article, next to the Tweetmeme Retweet button. When we first installed it, we set the Facebook button up with the default settings that included a share count, and the ability to pop open a new window to complete the share. These default settings are awful.

The first time I clicked on the Facebook button to test it out, I could not believe how long it took to populate the information to share. I did some tests, comparing it to the retweet button. Assuming you’re logged in to both Facebook and Twitter already, the Tweetmeme retweet button takes about 2 seconds to send your shared message over to Twitter.com, which you then send by hitting “Update.” So let’s say the total time is about 3 seconds to share.

With the Facebook button, it took quite a few seconds to load this new small window. And then it took another few to post the shared information to my wall. Also, the Facebook functionality attempts to pre-populate a picture from the post you are sharing. That’s a good idea in theory, but it’s almost always the wrong picture, so that’s another few seconds to cycle through those to find one (or get rid of it). So we’re looking at a total share time of 10 to 15 seconds.

While 10 to 15 seconds may not seem like a lot of time, compared to Twitter’s 2 to 3 seconds, it’s an eternity. And people who use both services will realize this (whether it is consciously or not), and I believe it will push them towards using Twitter more as their main sharing outlet.

And the gap is actually much larger if you’re logged out of both services to start. With Twitter, it takes a couple seconds max to sign in. With Facebook, it can take anywhere from several seconds, up to 30 seconds in my experience. All of this wasted time adds up, and it really disuades me from using Facebook to share things.

Another inexcusable time suck on Facebook’s end is caused by the pulling of the share count. Tweetmeme seems to do this on its button without much problem (though their count is sometimes off). With Facebook, it is another barrier to sharing because it slows the whole process down. Seeing this, our dev team made some changes to the button almost immediately. They removed the count number to reduce load time, and also got rid of the pop up window functionality. Instead, now when you hit the button, it will populate the information in a regular new browser window or tab. The result, is much, much faster (though still not Twitter fast).

A Need To Connect

Facebook does have a weapon that Twitter does not right now: Connect. A core idea behind Facebook Connect is that you can share things to Facebook (and back) without having to manually share them. That’s interesting, and eventually will be very powerful, but it’s still is nowhere near its potential. And the truth is that I’m not even sure Twitter needs a Connect of its own because third-party development community that keep pumping out sites and services that continue to feed the Twitter sharing machine.

Those same developers have not been doing that for Facebook because Facebook until very recently would not supply them with the type of developer support they needed for these third-party sites outside of Facebook proper. And now even with some (but not full) support, developers are not creating the same type of app ecosystem around (again, not inside) Facebook, that they have for Twitter. This limits the sharing pipeline for Facebook.

Facebook also has its Import functionality that users can use to auto post things like stories from Digg, Flickr photos they post, YouTube videos they favorite, and even blog posts they write. But this feature is horribly slow, and laughably unreliable. It was basically trying to offer much of what FriendFeed does, but it is worse in every way possible. Hopefully now that Facebook has bought FriendFeed, that will change.

Sharing Is Caring

Facebook recently added the “Everyone” button functionality and revamped its bookmarklet. To me, both of those signal Facebook’s desire to be the central place for sharing content on the web. Unfortunately, neither of these did anything to improve the speed of sharing.

There’s something else that is often overlooked, but very key to this sharing of information: Facebook has no simple way to reshare items. To be fair, Twitter doesn’t really either, but its users dreamed up the retweet idea, and soon it will be fully baked into the product, with the launch of the Retweet API.

Users have chosen not to use Facebook status messages in the same way, and there is no method to reshare News Feed items. FriendFeed has a very obvious “Share” button on each item which allows you to repost an item, or share it elsewhere. But maybe even worse, Facebook also has no method like FriendFeed of having interesting items that users “like” bubble back up to the top of the stream. Sure, they have a “Highlights” area, but that’s really pretty weak. It’s all about the stream, and currently, once an items falls off of the first page of the News Feed, the likelihood that you will ever see it again, is slim.

Again, maybe the FriendFeed acquisition will help remedy these things. Or maybe Facebook will once again take a play from Twitter’s playbook (as it did with the @ syntax) and create some sort of reshare functionality.

Traffic Doesn’t Lie

Obviously, users are going to want a sharing process to be as quick as possible, but while publishers care about that too, their bottom line is different: Traffic. You might think that Facebook would have the obvious advantage here since it’s much larger than Twitter, but you’d be wrong.

As we shared back in June, Twitter is in our top five referrers. Facebook? Not even on the list.

Actually, they are on the list, but farther down it. While Twitter is #3 or #4 (depending on the month), Facebook is more like #6, #7, or even as low as #10. And the gap between the two is pretty wide. That’s fairly remarkable for a site that is much, much smaller (Twitter) to be already easily beating its bigger rival (Facebook).

Maybe the new Facebook button will change that, but if I had to bet on it, I would say that it won’t. And I believe that speaks to the fact that it’s much easier to share on Twitter than it is on Facebook. And while it may not be a huge problem right now for them, it’s something I’d be taking very seriously. Speed and ease in sharing are only going to become more important in an increasingly social web.

Friday, October 2, 2009

Change Is in the Air for Mobile Advertising





Advertising and marketing dollars flowing to mobile will continue to lag behind consumer usage of the channel, similar to the situation with online advertising. eMarketer estimates that mobile ad spending, including messaging-based formats, will reach $416 million in 2009. EMarketer predicts that spending on mobile advertising will gain momentum over the next five years, reaching $1.56 billion by 2013.

Monday, September 28, 2009

Twitter to Raise $100 Million



Social networks are in the center of everything.
Here are the latest news about Twitter, which valuation is now more than $1Billion.



Twitter, the messaging web site that has become an Internet sensation, is nearing a deal to close as much as $100 million of new funding from as many as seven investors, according to people familiar with the deal.

The investor group includes mutual fund giant T. Rowe Price and private-equity firm Insight Venture Partners, which are new investors to Twitter. The $100 million investment is about twice as much as Twitter was reportedly expected to haul in this latest round of fund-raising.

Other investors in this round include venture-capital firms Spark Capital and Institutional Venture Partners, which have previously invested in Twitter.

The investors are valuing Twitter, which has yet to generate revenue or finalize its plans for making money, at about $1 billion. A person familiar with the deal said investors are applying a similar value to Twitter as that applied to Facebook, which at one point was valued at $15 Billion. By some estimates, Twitter is expected to have 25 million users by the end of 2009. Facebook has 300 million users.

Twitter could not immediately be reached for comment.

The Twitter valuation is quite a lift from the company’s last round of investing earlier this year, in which investors valued the company at around $255 million, according to people familiar with the matter.

The company still isn’t generating any real revenue, though executives say they are discussing various options, including advertising and premium services targeted at businesses.

The deal is expected to close today. It is Twitter’s third and largest round of fund-raising.

back in silicon valley



Back in Silicon Valley for a workshop week with the marketing team.
Launching plans will be the agenda.

Friday, September 18, 2009

Gartner: Mobile Advertising To Grow 74% In 2009


A new Gartner report projects that mobile ad spending worldwide will grow 74% this year to $913.5 million but not really accelerate until 2011, when advertisers are expected to boost mobile spending as part of an overall shift toward digital marketing channels.

By 2013, the research firm expects mobile ad spending to surpass $13 billion, with the Asia-Pacific region leading the way, followed by North America and Europe.

"After 2011, the trend will continue as smartphones and flat-rate data plans become more affordable to mainstream users," states the report, titled "Mobile Advertising Grows Quietly. "The growth in mobile advertising revenues is primarily driven by mobile Web banner ads, but it also has a strong growth component from mobile search, downloadable applications and SMS advertising."

Underlying the growth of these formats is increased consumer use of smartphones, which Gartner expects to account for 45.5% of all mobile phone sales in 2013, up from just over 9% in 2008. The embrace of smartphones -- especially the iPhone -- coupled with a rise in flat-rate data plan pricing, signals that a fundamental change is underway in how consumers interact with high-end devices.

While data usage is growing most rapidly among smartphone users, Gartner analyst Andrew Frank points out that that the increased mobile media consumption is leading Web publishers to create more user-friendly versions of their mobile sites, "which in turn is lifting mobile Web access among non-smartphone users."

A recent NPD report also noted that regular mobile phones have also increasingly adopted smartphone features such as Qwerty keyboards and touchscreens.

The report highlights location-based targeting, long hyped as one of the killer apps of mobile advertising, as still underutilized by finally coming into its own with the spread of GPS technology. "GPS-aware apps now provide a much simpler and more cost-effective means of achieving location targeting, while lowering the risks of consumer backlash," since no personally identifiable information needs to be sent by users.

Gartner expects location-based ads to find an audience among young mobile users who are increasingly using mobile devices to navigate and connect with friends on the go. The firm suggests that media companies will have to develop (or acquire) local directory services like Yelp and Citysearch to fully take advantage of location-based advertising on cell phones.

Another as-yet unfulfilled opportunity in mobile advertising lies in third-party advertising in mobile apps. Despite the explosion of apps sparked by Apple's App Store, most have yet to integrate advertising. And among those that have, the prevalence of house ads indicates that revenue growth is significantly lagging the opportunity afforded by rising usage.

Gartner also predicts that mobile handsets will increasingly complement other types of advertising as a "universal back channel," especially for out-of-home media. The firm's research supports the idea that young consumers in particular will accept free mobile content subsidized by advertising.

Even so, the report acknowledges that user acceptance generally, and regulation of more highly targeted and personalized forms of advertising, remain a potential hazard for advertisers, content providers and carriers. Other barriers to mobile ad growth cited by Gartner include the proliferation of non-standard devices and metrics and mobile spam, especially in connection with SMS text marketing.

While encouraging advertisers and agencies to look at precise targeting by time and location, the firm advises them to maintain a keen sensitivity to privacy issues and permission strategies.

complete article here
http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&art_aid=112717

Monday, September 14, 2009

social networks expansion is underestimated



Common Sense Media, a watchdog group that examines children’s media exposure, has released the results of an online survey showing that, to the surprise of few, teenagers are extraordinarily plugged in to social networks like Facebook. Other studies have shown as much in the past.
Skip to next paragraph

But Common Sense is apparently the first to ask parents about their perceptions of their own children’s media usage — and here the numbers get interesting.

While 22 percent of teenagers check social networks more than 10 times a day, only 4 percent of parents believe their children do so. And while 51 percent check more than once daily, only 23 percent of parents acknowledge as much.

James Steyer, the chief executive of Common Sense Media, said that the figures pointed to a gap in parents’ understanding of how their children’s social lives were structured.

“It’s not just that parents don’t keep track,” he said. “They also don’t know the extent to which this has changed the way kids socialize, the way they communicate and also the way they learn.”

Monday, September 7, 2009

Facebook Exodus



Things fall apart; the center cannot hold. Facebook, the online social grid, could not command loyalty forever. If you ask around, as I did, you’ll find quitters. One person shut down her account because she disliked how nosy it made her. Another thought the scene had turned desperate. A third feared stalkers. A fourth believed his privacy was compromised. A fifth disappeared without a word.


Facebook Exodus
The exodus is not evident from the site’s overall numbers. According to comScore, Facebook attracted 87.7 million unique visitors in the United States in July. But while people are still joining Facebook and compulsively visiting the site, a small but noticeable group are fleeing — some of them ostentatiously.

Leif Harmsen, once a Facebook user, now crusades against it. Having dismissed his mother’s snap judgment of the site (“Facebook is the devil”), Harmsen now passionately agrees. He says, not entirely in jest, that he considers it a repressive regime akin to North Korea, and sells T-shirts with the words “Shut Your Facebook.” What especially galls him is the commercialization and corporate regulation of personal and social life. As Facebook endeavors to be the Web’s headquarters — to compete with Google, in other words, and to make money from the information it gathers — it’s inevitable that some people would come to view it as Big Brother.

“The more dependent we allow ourselves to become to something like Facebook — and Facebook does everything in its power to make you more dependent — the more Facebook can and does abuse us,” Harmsen explained by indignant e-mail. “It is not ‘your’ Facebook profile. It is Facebook’s profile about you.”

The disillusionment with Facebook has come in waves. An early faction lost faith in 2008, when Facebook’s beloved Scrabble application, Scrabulous, was pulled amid copyright issues. It was suddenly clear that Facebook was not just a social club but also an expanding force on the Web, beholden to corporate interests. A later group, Harmsen’s crowd, grew frustrated last winter when Facebook seemed to claim perpetual ownership of users’ contributions to the site. (Facebook later adjusted its membership contract, but it continues to integrate advertising, intellectual property and social life.) A third wave of dissenters appears to be bored with it, obscurely sore or just somehow creeped out.

My friend Alex joined four years ago at the suggestion of “the coolest guy on the planet,” she told me in an e-mail message. For a while, they cultivated a cool-planet online gang. But then Scrabulous was shut down, someone told her she was too old for Facebook, her teenage stepson seemed to be losing his life to it and she found the whole site crawling with mercenaries trying to sell books and movies. “If I am going to waste my time on the Internet,” she concluded, “it will be playing in online backgammon tournaments.”

Another friend, who didn’t want his name used, found that Facebook undermined his whole notion of online friendship. “It’s easy to think of your circle of ‘Friends’ as a coherent circle, clear and moated, when in fact the splay of overlap/network makes drip/action painting a better (visual) analogy.” Something happened to this drip painting that he won’t discuss. He said, “Postings that seem private can scatter and slip unpredictably into a sort of semipublic status.”

That friend was not the only Facebook dissenter who was reticent about specifics. Many seem to have just lost their appetite for it: they just stopped wanting to look at other people’s photos and résumés and updates, or have their own subject to scrutiny. Some ex-users seemed shaken, even heartbroken, by their breakups with Facebook. “I primarily left Facebook because I was wasting so much time on it,” my friend Caroline Harting told me by e-mail. “I felt fairly detached from my Facebook buddies because I rarely directly contacted them.” Instead, she felt as if she stalked them, spending hours a day looking at their pages without actually saying hello.

But then came the truly weird part: “Facebook was stalking me,” Harting wrote. One day, on another Web site, she responded to an invitation to rate a movie she saw. The next time she logged on to Facebook, there was a message acknowledging that she had made the rating. “I didn’t appreciate being monitored so closely,” she wrote. She quit.

Julie Klam, a writer and prolific and eloquent Facebook updater, said in her own e-mail message, “I have noticed the exodus, and I kind of feel like it’s kids getting tired of a new toy.” Klam, who still posts updates to Facebook but now prefers Twitter for professional networking, added, “Facebook is good for finding people, but by now the novelty of that has worn off, and everyone’s been found.” As of a few months ago, she told me, Facebook “felt dead.”

Is Facebook doomed to someday become an online ghost town, run by zombie users who never update their pages and packs of marketers picking at the corpses of social circles they once hoped to exploit? Sad, if so. Though maybe fated, like the demise of a college clique.

complete article here
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/30/magazine/30FOB-medium-t.html?_r=1

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

social networks and privacy



here is an article with many social networks' drifts regarding privacy.

How Facebook Ruins Friendships
Notice to my friends: I love you all dearly.

But I don't give a hoot that you are "having a busy Monday," your child "took 30 minutes to brush his teeth," your dog "just ate an ant trap" or you want to "save the piglets." And I really, really don't care which Addams Family member you most resemble. (I could have told you the answer before you took the quiz on Facebook.)

Here's where you and I went wrong: We took our friendship online. First we began communicating more by email than by phone. Then we switched to "instant messaging" or "texting." We "friended" each other on Facebook, and began communicating by "tweeting" our thoughts—in 140 characters or less—via Twitter.



All this online social networking was supposed to make us closer. And in some ways it has. Thanks to the Internet, many of us have gotten back in touch with friends from high school and college, shared old and new photos, and become better acquainted with some people we might never have grown close to offline.

Last year, when a friend of mine was hit by a car and went into a coma, his friends and family were able to easily and instantly share news of his medical progress—and send well wishes and support—thanks to a Web page his mom created for him.

But there's a danger here, too. If we're not careful, our online interactions can hurt our real-life relationships.

Like many people, I'm experiencing Facebook Fatigue. I'm tired of loved ones—you know who you are—who claim they are too busy to pick up the phone, or even write a decent email, yet spend hours on social-media sites, uploading photos of their children or parties, forwarding inane quizzes, posting quirky, sometimes nonsensical one-liners or tweeting their latest whereabouts. ("Anyone know a good restaurant in Berlin?")

One of the big problems is how we converse. Typing still leaves something to be desired as a communication tool; it lacks the nuances that can be expressed by body language and voice inflection. "Online, people can't see the yawn," says Patricia Wallace, a psychologist at Johns Hopkins University's Center for Talented Youth and author of "The Psychology of the Internet."

But let's face it, the problem is much greater than which tools we use to communicate. It's what we are actually saying that's really mucking up our relationships. "Oh my God, a college friend just updated her Facebook status to say that her 'teeth are itching for a flossing!'" shrieked a friend of mine recently. "That's gross. I don't want to hear about what's going on inside her mouth."

That prompted me to check my own Facebook page, only to find that three of my pals—none of whom know each other—had the exact same status update: "Zzzzzzz." They promptly put me to "zzzzzzz."

This brings us to our first dilemma: Amidst all this heightened chatter, we're not saying much that's interesting, folks. Rather, we're breaking a cardinal rule of companionship: Thou Shalt Not Bore Thy Friends.

"It's called narcissism," says Matt Brown, a 36-year-old business-development manager for a chain of hair salons and spas in Seattle. He's particularly annoyed by a friend who works at an auto dealership who tweets every time he sells a car, a married couple who bicker on Facebook's public walls and another couple so "mooshy-gooshy" they sit in the same room of their house posting love messages to each other for all to see. "Why is your life so frickin' important and entertaining that we need to know?" Mr. Brown says.
'I Just Ate a Frito Pie'

Gwen Jewett, for her part, is sick of meal status updates. "A few of my friends like to post several times a day about what they are eating: 'I just ate a Frito pie.' 'I am enjoying a double hot-fudge sundae at home tonight.' 'Just ate a whole pizza with sausage, peppers and double cheese,'" says the 49-year-old career coach in suburban Dallas. "My question is this: If we didn't call each other on the phone every time we ate before, why do we need the alerts now?"

For others, boredom isn't the biggest challenge of managing Internet relationships. Consider, for example, how people you know often seem different online—not just gussied up or more polished, but bolder, too, displaying sides of their personalities you have never seen before.

Alex Gilbert, 27, who works for a nonprofit in Houston that teaches creative writing to kids, is still puzzling over an old friend—"a particularly masculine-type dude"—who plays in a heavy-metal band and heads a motorcycle club yet posts videos on Facebook of "uber cute" kittens. "It's not fodder for your real-life conversation," Mr. Gilbert says. "We're not going to get together and talk about how cute kittens are."

James Hills discovered that a colleague is gay via Facebook, but he says that didn't bother him. It was after his friend joined groups that cater to hairy men, such as "Furball NYC," that he was left feeling awkward. "This is something I just didn't need to know," says Mr. Hills, who is 32 and president of a marketing firm in Elgin, Ill. "I'd feel the same way if it was a straight friend joining a leather-and-lace group."

And then there's jealousy. In all that information you're posting about your life—your vacation, your kids, your promotions at work, even that margarita you just drank—someone is bound to find something to envy. When it comes to relationships, such online revelations can make breaking up even harder to do.

"Facebook prolongs the period it takes to get over someone, because you have an open window into their life, whether you want to or not," says Yianni Garcia of New York, a consultant who helps companies use social media. "You see their updates, their pictures and their relationship status."

Mr. Garcia, 24, felt the sting of Facebook jealousy personally last spring, after he split up with his boyfriend. For a few weeks, he continued to visit his ex's Facebook page, scrutinizing his new friends. Then one day he discovered that his former boyfriend had blocked him from accessing his profile.

Why? "He said he'd only 'unfriended' me to protect himself, because if someone flirted with me he would feel jealous," Mr. Garcia says.

Facebook can also be a mecca for passive-aggressive behavior. "Suddenly, things you wouldn't say out loud in conversation are OK to say because you're sitting behind a computer screen," says Kimberly Kaye, 26, an arts writer in New York. She was surprised when friends who had politely discussed health-care reform over dinner later grew much more antagonistic when they continued the argument online.

Just ask Heather White. She says her college roommate at the University of Georgia started an argument over text about who should clean their apartment. Ms. White, 22, who was home visiting her parents at the time, asked her friend to call her so they could discuss the issue. Her friend never did.

A few days later, Ms. White, who graduated in May, updated her Facebook status, commenting that her favorite country duo, Brooks & Dunn, just broke up. Almost immediately, her roommate responded, writing publicly on her wall: "Just like us." The two women have barely spoken since then.
Band-Aid Tactics

So what's the solution, short of "unfriending" or "unfollowing" everyone who annoys you? You can use the "hide" button on Facebook to stop getting your friends' status updates—they'll never know—or use TwitterSnooze, a Web site that allows you to temporarily suspend tweets from someone you follow. (Warning: They'll get a notice from Twitter when you begin reading their tweets again.)

But these are really just Band-Aid tactics. To improve our interactions, we need to change our conduct, not just cover it up. First, watch your own behavior, asking yourself before you post anything: "Is this something I'd want someone to tell me?" "Run it by that focus group of one," says Johns Hopkins's Dr. Wallace.

And positively reward others, responding only when they write something interesting, ignoring them when they are boring or obnoxious. (Commenting negatively will only start a very public war.)

If all that fails, you can always start a new group: "Get Facebook to Create an Eye-Roll Button Now!"

complete article here
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204660604574370450465849142.html

Friday, August 28, 2009

governments committed for social networks' data privacy




Canada starts the long run for user' privacy control for social networks.
As Right People has developped and patented a technology giving full control to the user for his/her private data, here is an interesting article preframing the next future.


Facebook.com has serious privacy gaps according to a report by Canada's privacy commissioner, Reuters says.



Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart said that privacy information on the site was confusing and incomplete.

Some of Facebook's violations as mentioned in the report are:

* Retaining personal information of users who have deactivated their accounts.
* Providing information on how to deactivate accounts, but not on how to delete accounts.
* Disclosing users personal information to third-party developers. There are around 950,000 developers in 180 countries, Stoddart said via Reuters.

In response, Facebook said it retained personal information of users who deactivated their accounts only because half of those users usually reactivated the accounts.

Facebook objected to other conclusions on the report, but is co-operating with Stoddart and even resolved some of the issues. Stoddard said the matter would be escalated to Federal Court if all the violations were not dealt with in 30 days.

Monday, August 24, 2009

how social networks are becoming the center of the internet

From a study conducted by CNW group "Social Media Reality"









Saturday, August 22, 2009

LinkedIn is not going to be swallowed by Facebook



About the question of social network' multiplicity.

LinkedIn Plans to Open Up in a Closed Sort of Way

Dan Nye, the chief executive of LinkedIn, has looked closely at the frenzy around Facebook, and has made a crucial decision: There will be no food fights on LinkedIn.

Yes, he’s rushing to copy the electronic underpinnings of Facebook’s elegant application programming interface, or A.P.I., that allows outside developers to weave their own programs into its site. But because his site is aimed at professionals seeking to network, he wants to keep these add-ons all business, unlike the unrestrained goofiness on Facebook, where programs let you turn your friends into vampires, draw graffiti on their pages, and challenge them to stimulating news quizzes.

“We have no interest in doing it like Facebook with an open A.P.I. letting people do whatever they want,” Mr. Nye said. “We’re not going to have people sending electronic hamburgers to each other.”
Dan NyeDan Nye, chief executive of LinkedIn (Photo: Dave Getzschman )

So LinkedIn will have to approve any company that wants to tap into its system. Mr. Nye says he is looking for two kinds of applications. First, there are deals that enable LinkedIn members to tap into their connections in other places, for example, while using applications like Salesforce.com. Second, some applications will be allowed to add features to LinkedIn’s own site. Mr. Nye offered, as an example, a module connected to a trade show or conference that integrated travel planning and other features.

What’s wrong with a little harmless fun between vampires?

“On many other Web sites, there is a lot of noise and a lot of interference,” he said. “When you go to LinkedIn, we want you to be confident you can accomplish your goals, be productive and move on with your day. We are not trying to get you to come back multiple times throughout the day.”

LinkedIn’s approach differs from Facebook in another way: money. For now, Facebook is not getting paid anything by the companies using its system as a platform. Mr. Nye said LinkedIn is interested in arrangements that offer it a share of revenue generated through its system. He wasn’t very specific about how such deals would work.

While this approach may be less idealistic than that of Facebook, it is also more stable in the long term. MySpace initially allowed its members to do almost anything on their pages, but it started cracking down on page widgets that were overtly commercial (and didn’t cut a deal). And many Facebook developers worry the same may happen to them.

Here are a few other tidbits from our conversation:
LinkedIn is sprinting toward a public offering.

“We think we are building a very large independent public company,” Mr. Nye said almost as soon as he sat down.

Since he joined LinkedIn in February, the company has grown from 60 to 170 people. And in Mountain View, Calif., where Google has gobbled up nearly all the real estate, LinkedIn has space for 300 employees. The service has 15 million members and adds another 1 million every 25 days, he said.

When I asked when it would be ready to file for a stock sale, Mr. Nye gave the usual corporate boilerplate.

“We are in no hurry to go public,” he said. “We are trying to build a company the right way for the long haul.”
LinkedIn makes money

Mr. Nye said the company had just become profitable at the end of last year, when its revenue was just over $10 million. By next year, he said LinkedIn hopes for revenue of $75 million to $100 million. The company’s revenue is split roughly evenly between advertising, online purchases of premium memberships and job listings, and bulk sales to corporations.

Of these, advertising is most likely to grow fastest, he said. “Look at the quality of our membership. It largely mirrors the Wall Street Journal audience.” The average income is $140,000 he said, and the average age is 35.
LinkedIn is not going to be swallowed by Facebook

Mr. Nye said he doesn’t consider LinkedIn to be a social network. The corporate mission is to build a “productivity tool to make professional people more effective.” For now, that means the service is built for recruiting, sales and information gathering. But Mr. Nye, who once ran the small business division of Intuit, said he was thinking broadly about other opportunities. (He gave no hints, though.)

Mr. Nye argued that even people who do want to spend their days tossing burgers at their buddies on Facebook may also want to put on a more dignified face on LinkedIn.

“When people tell the story that there will be one graph they are crazy,” he said. “These are different platforms that are built for different purposes, with different members and different relationships between them.”

the complete article here
http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/10/12/linkedin-plans-to-open-up-in-a-closed-sort-of-way/

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

sponsored links represent now 62% of advertisers' investment intentions



In a new survey from "eSearch Vision", advertisers give their intentions of advertising investments for the next year.

Sponsored links (profesional wording being SEM) win with 62% of invetsment intentions.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

Right People fund raising tour has now moved into one-to-one meetings



We have now started phase 2 of our fund raising roadshow and conducting the one-to-one meetings with the investors that selected us.

... to be continued....

Monday, July 13, 2009

7 steps for Business Relationships in Social Media

Business Relationships in Social Media
Posted by admin on June 29, 2009 under Social Media |

Social Media is a great place for personal connections, and can be even more powerful as a business connection point. But if not properly managed and monitored, you can end up spending much more time than you intent to and be carried away in the maze, not able to give proper business justification for the same

Formulating a plan and deciding where all to connect is often the first step to start building and assuming that many people already are part of one social network or the other here is a process that can make life easier and make you reachable

An underlining philosophy is that you need to be visible, connected and reachable.

Step 1 – Start a Blog
If you don’t you are loosing out on a very powerful tool that can improve your reach and reputation.

Step 2 – Use LinkedIn
since many professionals are part of LinkedIn, the success is not in registering but in using it to connect, involve in discussions and more

Step 3 – Join Facebook
Make Facebook your preferred Social Networking platform, you will be amazed to see how many people both personal and professional use it and this also gives you a basic idea into what interests the people you know.

Step 4 – Search Twitter
People keep tweeting about your expertise and area of interest almost every time. As the most powerful and emerging business and personal branding arena, you need to be on it

Step 5 – Share FriendFeed
Let people know what you read, and know what the people who interest you like. Get connected, converse and build

Step 6 – Keep Bookmarking
Digg, Delicious, Magnolia, Reddit, and more, share your thoughts via the service of your choice.

Step7 – Subscribe to a Reader
Google reader, my favorite spot on the web keeps me informed with news, alerts on my business and prospects.

Now for the biggest problem of all, finding the time to use all these; there are a variety of tools that can help you to integrate and make these process faster.

If you start spending ½ hour per day managing your Social Media Relationships, you can find in a few days that your ½ hour actually helps you to be connected which otherwise would take you around 5 hours to do so.

Imagine the possibilities of connecting with all your business and personal contacts on a daily basis and still only having to spend the time you take to have coffee with one

Thursday, July 9, 2009

Facebook is targeted and attacked by private data defenders



Only in french, sorry.

Plutôt Facebook ou face de bouc?
Web. Souvent tourné en dérision, le réseau social aux plus de 150 millions d’inscrits est la cible des défenseurs de la vie privée.

Imagine, un type sonne à ta porte, super-enthousiaste : «On s’est connu à l’école, en cours de maths, on se détestait.» Veux-tu être mon ami ?«Confirme ou ignore.» Ensuite, normalement, le neuneu qui a sonné à la porte menace de mettre toutes les photos du voyage scolaire à Paris où tu es en train de gerber dans la baignoire et promet de les montrer à ta mère. Et ainsi de suite, ad nauseam.

Argh, on est en plein cauchemar ? Non, c’est la mise en réalité à peine caricaturée de ce que vivent chacun des 150 à 200 millions d’utilisateurs du social-networking qu’est Facebook, dans un hilarant petit film anglais qui circule à tour de Net (1) : le quotidien, avec les intrusions variées, de Nathalie de 3e B qui souhaite communiquer sur son mari, ses mômes, son boulot, son asthme à l’Australien de Sydney qui veut être ton ami. Le social-networking, d’une incroyable utilité professionnelle pour certains, d’une invraisemblable vacuité pour les autres. Comme se demande Nina Testut, sociologue et auteure de Facebook, et moi, et moi et moi? (2) : «Est-ce l’ère du vide ou de l’intelligence collective ?»Ça dépend de quel point de vue on se place. Côté fans, on a les «koaaaaaaaa, t’es pas sur Facebook, comment je fais pour t’envoyer le flyer, les photos de ta cuite ou de ton mec avec une poule, un match-test, n’importe quoi ?»

Parmi les moins chauds, on trouve l’humoriste Jérôme Commandeur et son sketch (3) sur l’aspect grotesque du social -networking et de la vie en direct : «15 heures, Jean-Jacques a mangé un paquet de Pépito. 15 h 30, il a plus faim. 16 heures, il a envie de gerber.» Et d’en rajouter sur les groupes : «Le groupe de ceux qui apprennent les horaires du RER B, le groupe de ceux qui disent "je t’emmerde" au lieu de "merci"», et les anciens du collège qui rappliquent comme les «oiseaux d’Hitchcock».

Bon, il y a réellement débat sur la question. Mais les anti-Facebook frémissent de plus en plus. Limite s’il ne devient pas classe de ne pas en être.

Pour preuve, les signes laissés sur le réseau par ceux qui chantent la chanson anti-Facebook, ceux qui décrochent de Facebook avec la Facecorette (5), ceux qui sont sur Facebook dans le groupe «j’aime pas Facebook et son marketing insidieux». Ces antis dénonçant, un rien faux-culs, «Facebook et l’hypocrisie lamentable des relations humaines, ce n’est que par politesse, courtoisie, hypocrisie et respect des conventions mondaines que je squatte ces sites pathétiques».

Impossible de chiffrer les rebelles, impossible de dénombrer les parodies du site ou les détournements, dont «Facebouc ou le netouorkingue» pour trouver un ami à face de bouc. Mais ils sont là, tapis dans l’ombre

Sunday, June 28, 2009

The power of social networks

Social networks can aggregate crowds around a cause, a product with a power never reched before. Here is a live example in the U.K.



Four hundred people spontaneously broke into a choreographed dance routine in Liverpool Street Station in January for the shooting of an advertising campaign by T-Mobile.



Travelers at the Liverpool Street Station in London were surprised one morning last January when several hundred of their fellow commuters, instead of scurrying toward the 11:15 train to Southend-on-Sea, started dancing to the sounds of Lulu’s “Shout.”

A day and a half later the routine, captured by hidden cameras, showed up during a break in the reality television show “Celebrity Big Brother.” The seemingly spontaneous performance turned out to have been an advertising stunt for T-Mobile, a wireless telephone network that used it for a campaign built around the slogan “Life’s for Sharing.”

Sharing is exactly what happened next. While the ad, in its entirety, was shown only once on television, word of it spread via e-mail, blogs and social networks, until it was watched more than 15 million times on YouTube. The spot spawned spoofs and imitators who organized similar events, including one that shut down Liverpool Street Station a few weeks later.

“It seemed to spread a bit of joy at a time when people really needed it,” said Kate Stanners, executive creative director at Saatchi & Saatchi London, the agency that created the ad.

The campaign may have cheered up recession-weary Londoners, but it also showed why many people in the media business feel spurned these days. Advertising as it has long been known — television commercials, newspaper ads and the like — is a shrinking part of the marketing equation. What happens elsewhere, mostly on the Internet, is what increasingly matters.

Advertisers did not suddenly wake up to the Internet; they have been shifting growing portions of their budgets online for years. But the popularity of social networking and other Web 2.0 phenomena is helping them use consumers to spread the word for them, allowing them to cut down on paid advertising.

While music companies, movie studios and publishers, among others, are trying to figure out ways to get consumers to pay for their content online, advertising is moving in the other direction.

Marcel Fenez, head of the media practice at PriceWaterhouseCoopers, said that during the current economic downturn, a lot of paid advertising would be lost for good, separating this downturn from previous ones, when ad spending recovered relatively quickly. After a 12 percent plunge this year, global ad spending will not climb back to 2007 levels for another five years, Mr. Fenez said.

“It’s different this time,” he said. “There’s obviously some element of cyclical in it, but our belief is that it is largely structural.”

Not surprisingly, PriceWaterhouseCoopers’s forecasts are gloomiest for newspapers and television, which it expects will suffer from ad spending declines of 16 percent and 11 percent this year, respectively. But even Internet advertising will fall by 2 percent, and it will recover only slowly, the company said.

Some formerly high-flying Internet businesses like MySpace, owned by News Corp., have been brought to earth by the recession. With advertising in decline, the social networking service recently announced plans to cut 30 percent of its staff. Other Web 2.0 businesses, like YouTube, owned by Google, are still trying to figure out how to monetize the vast amounts of traffic they generate.

Amid such a broad-based downturn, the advertising industry has also been hurt, and the mood is sober as representatives from all over the world gather this week in Cannes for an annual get-together. Instead of competing to host the most lavish beach parties, as they have in previous years, agencies are trying to outdo each other with understatement.

Martin Sorrell, chief executive of WPP Group, the world’s largest advertising company, calls 2009 a “write-off” for the industry. While marketers are slightly less pessimistic than they were a few months ago, they remain cautious, and a recovery in ad spending is likely to lag behind improvement in the economy, he added.

“While the head and the heart may be better, I don’t think that has extended to the hand writing the checks,” he said.

Ad agency companies have been cutting jobs and costs, but they have been slightly more insulated than many media owners because they get paid regardless of whether advertisers choose to spend their money on newspapers, television, magazines, radio, billboards or the Internet. Also, companies like WPP and Publicis Groupe, which owns Saatchi & Saatchi, have been expanding their capabilities in digital marketing and other areas outside traditional advertising.

In the past, ad agencies were often paid on commission, as a percentage of advertising sales, but their compensation is increasingly being fixed at hourly rates, as it is for lawyers or accountants. Because digital marketing campaigns are more labor-intensive to develop than ads in traditional media, executives say, this means higher fees.

Advertisers — at least those that can still afford to spend — have also found some benefits in the confluence of a cyclical economic downturn with a structural shift toward free advertising on the Internet. The price of advertising in many paid-for media has fallen, for instance.

Simon Clift, chief marketing officer of Unilever, the consumer products conglomerate, said that on average, the company was paying about 5 percent less for ad space and time than it did last year.

“We’ve been getting some real bargains and, even better, some real value,” he said. “The overriding message of the Internet is that you can do more with less.”

How does free advertising look? It can take many forms: Getting a journalist or blogger to review a new mobile phone, placing a video on YouTube, spreading the word via bloggers, and starting a Facebook group dedicated to a brand or product.

Free advertising does not mean the end of the paid kind. As in the case of the T-Mobile campaign, paid advertising can help get the process started. For some things, like burnishing a company’s image or stimulating consumers’ desire for an expensive pair of shoes, there may be few free options. And new technology will bolster the advertising capabilities of traditional media like television, backers say.

But in the future, none of these things will exist in isolation. Advertising executives have been talking about “integrating” their campaigns for years, with mixed results, but now consumers are doing it for them.

“People have been a bit sloppy with the word advertising,” said Richard Pinder, chief operating officer of Publicis Worldwide.

“It came to mean spending money on television or newspapers,” he said. “Actually, I think we’re going back to the original meaning of the word, which is to say, I hope that people are aware of my brand and interested in knowing more about it.”

complete article here

Friday, June 26, 2009

US to prepare user's data confidentiality regulations



Web Privacy Efforts Targeted
Facing Rules, Ad Firms to Give Consumers More Control

The threat of new regulations involving Internet privacy is prompting Web advertisers to give consumers more control over how their private information is collected and used online.

In coming weeks, a group of advertising, media and Internet trade groups plan to announce new guidelines for Web sites that they say could better protect consumers' privacy online.

Among the measures is an icon that would appear either on Web pages or ads alerting consumers if their activity is being tracked. Clicking the icon would reveal information on the activities that a site collects about visitors, along with a list of companies that use this data, said an official at an ad trade group.

View Full Image

Sears

A Sears Web page. The retailer settled with the FTC this month over allegations it didn't adequately inform visitors about its monitoring.
The trade groups behind the effort include the American Association of Advertising Agencies, the Association of National Advertisers, the Direct Marketing Association and the Interactive Advertising Bureau.

The groups came together last February to develop privacy guidelines for the industry in response to growing scrutiny by the federal government over how Web advertisers use private information they collect. Congress is drafting legislation that would give consumers more control over how such information is used.

The possible legislation comes as the Federal Trade Commission is taking on a more active role in policing online privacy. Earlier this month, the FTC reached a settlement with Sears Holdings Corp.over allegations by the trade watchdog that the retailer failed to adequately inform consumers the extent to which it was monitoring their activities on the Web.

"Congress has industry's attention at a level that it has never had before," said Mike Zaneis, vice president of public policy at the Interactive Advertising Bureau. "The industry understands that there is a legislative threat out there right now."

At issue is the ability of marketers to tailor ads to consumers based on personal information gleaned online.

Regulators are focused on a technique called "behavioral targeting," in which a company tracks consumers' online activities, such as the searches they make, the Web sites they visit and the products they buy. Marketers then use this to present ads based on consumers' likely interests, such as showing ads for diapers to people who have visited Web sites on raising children.

Several popular Web sites are likely to redesign their pages around the new guidelines from the trade groups, according to an official at an advertising trade group.

The plan for the icon that consumers can click to check what data is collected and by whom would include an easy way for consumers to choose to not have their data collected, this person said. Marketers also could include a similar icon on the ads that they targeted to consumers based on their Web surfing, this person added.

Internet and ad companies also are finalizing practices related to data security and retention, including how long companies store information about their customers, the groups say. Also under discussion is creation of an industrywide Web site that would show consumers what information is collected and how to opt out.

The measures are an attempt to preserve what many ad executives say is the future of the industry, both online and in other media such as TV.

"The less information we are able to gather from consumers regarding their interests and their behaviors, the less likely it is that a marketer can provide more timely, relevant and targeted ads to consumers," said Marc Fleishhacker, a managing director Ogilvy, an ad agency owned by WPP.

But whether the industry's preventive measures stave off regulators remains to be seen.

"The jury is out on whether or not self-regulation is going to achieve the desired state here, which is for consumers to receive clear notice that information is being collected and meaningful explanation of what that information is and what it is being used for," said Eileen Harrington, a deputy director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection.

complete article here

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Right People Interview on RadioBFM




Listen to the interview here

Tuesday, June 23, 2009

why users will soon freak out about data privacy




Two signs about this article form the NEw-York Times:

- it explains that privacy and users concerns about privacy now reaches email confidentiality and usage.
- this article has been rated as the one most emailed to friends on the NEw York Times website.



Here is the article:

Typing In an E-Mail Address, and Giving Up Your Friends’ as Well.

I THOUGHT it was a little strange when I received separate e-mail messages from two people I knew only slightly asking me to click and see their photos on a social networking site called Tagged.

I ignored them at first, but then thought maybe I should check it out. After all, I should keep up on what’s hot in the social networking world, right? This could be the new Twitter.

That’s when I started doing everything wrong. I obligingly typed in my e-mail address and a password to see those photos. Well, the photos didn’t exist, but I had unwittingly given the site “permission” to go through my entire e-mail contact list and send a message to everyone, inviting them to see my “photos.”

I found this out only when I started receiving e-mail back from people agreeing to be my friend. I quickly realized what had happened and shot off an apologetic message explaining why I inadvertently spammed them.

As friends’ responses started rolling in, I heard from some who had received similar e-mail. Others told me about the same problems with Web sites like MyLife.com and desktopdating.net.

This wasn’t along the lines of someone stealing my bank account information or Social Security number, but I was annoyed and embarrassed.

“They’re using your good name to establish a connection,” said Peter Cassidy, secretary general of the Anti-Phishing Working Group, a nonprofit organization with representatives from law enforcement, industry and government.

So what’s going on here? I turned to Michael Argast, a security analyst with Sophos, an Internet security company based in Boston, to find out.

He told me that this kind of thing has been happening for quite a long time in various forms, but has really caught on in the last three to six months. It’s not the same as what’s known as phishing — fake Web sites masquerading as real ones to get personal information. These Web sites really exist.

Instead, this is generally called contact scraping. Once you enter your credentials, like your user name or password, the company sweeps through your contact list and sends everyone an invitation to join the site.

How do the companies benefit? They are expanding their user population, Mr. Argast said, which they can use to attract potential investors or advertisers. Whether those users are willing participants, or people like me, is another question.

“There are multiple shades of gray,” Mr. Argast said. “Some social networking sites, like Facebook, are pretty straightforward in asking if you want to share information about your friends. Others are far less scrupulous.”

In the case of Tagged, my friends received a perky e-mail saying: “Alina has added you as a friend on Tagged. Is Alina your friend?” Then you click on yes or no. Even more insidiously, it adds, “Please respond or Alina may think you said no,” with a sad-face icon next to it.

I apparently also offered to share some photos; some annoyed friends even told me to resend the pictures because they couldn’t find them.

“It’s using the chain mail psychology,” Mr. Argast said. And he’s right. My friends got guilt-tripped into signing on.

It’s easier for these sites to get information from Web-based e-mail accounts, like Hotmail and Gmail, than from local Internet provider services, like Verizon or Comcast, but nothing is absolutely secure, Mr. Argast said.

I spoke to Greg Tseng, founder and chief executive of Tagged, to ask him what happened. He said all social networking sites invite you to e-mail your contact list to join up or discover which of your friends are already members, but that a software glitch meant an unusually large number of accidental invitations went out recently.

He said the company received almost 2,000 complaints from people who didn’t intend to send invitations to all their contacts — a fraction of the three million people who registered in the month when the problem occurred.

“We immediately pushed the pause button,” Mr. Tseng said. “This business lives and dies by the good will of people.” He added, “We took immediate steps to rectify this problem and improve the user experience on Tagged.”

Mr. Tseng said Tagged was the third-largest social networking site after Facebook and MySpace, with 16 million active users and 80 million registered users. And guess what? I’m counted as one of those registered users now.

A colleague, Tom, received a similar “invitation” from an acquaintance inviting him to join MyLife.com about a month ago. He clicked on “yes,” and started receiving e-mail from people on his contact list thanking him for inviting them.

“At first it was amusing, but when I realized that it was mining my address book, it wasn’t so funny anymore,” he said. MyLife.com was formerly Reunion.com, another site that stirred up numerous complaints regarding contact scraping.

Jeff Tinsley, founder and chief executive of MyLife.com, said that his company was constantly improving its registration system.

“We register more than two million users a month, and the complaint rate is very small,” Mr. Tinsley said. “It’s very important to make the process very clear, but that said, sometimes people are going with the flow and not paying attention. It’s impossible to just take someone’s address book. An individual has to give us his credentials.”

Tom, however, said he didn’t recall typing in his password, so he was not sure how his address book was accessed.

In some cases, buried deep within a company’s terms of service or privacy policy is information about sharing e-mail addresses, but few people ever get that far.

“We don’t think the consent is meaningful or transparent,” said Marc Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a public interest research organization. “People don’t know how their information is being used.”

Donna Tapellini, senior editor for Consumer Reports, which reported on this in its June issue, said such practices raised privacy issues. “It’s your private contact list and you should be able to protect it,” she said.

Such actions may also violate the federal antispamming law — officially known as Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act and unofficially as Can-Spam — which regulates unsolicited commercial e-mail, prohibiting, among other things, false or misleading information in a subject line, said Eileen Harrington, deputy director of the Bureau of Consumer Protection with the Federal Trade Commission. Ms. Harrington emphasized that she was speaking in general terms.

“We’re now fully in the era of Web 2.0 and under many circumstances, consumers may be providing more information than they realize,” she said.

The problem is, it takes a long time for people to learn the tricks. So here are some words of advice from Mr. Argast.

First, don’t supply your user name and password from one site — say Yahoo or Gmail — to a third-party site. And don’t use the same user names and passwords for different sites. That’s good advice that most of us — myself included — often fail to follow. He told me some 80 percent of users his company surveyed reuse their passwords.

The problem, of course, is remembering different user names and passwords. There are programs or tools that provide an easy way to remember multiple passwords, like 1Password, Sxipper, Keychain or Firefox Password Manager.

You can also set up a separate e-mail account for registrations, which won’t have your contact list.

Also, just be alert. Look closely at the invitation. Are there misspellings, for example? Does something just feel not right? If so, e-mail your friend asking if he meant to send you the query.

Finally, I used this opportunity to clean up my contact list. I hope I’m too savvy to have this happen again, but if it does, at least that acquaintance I met in a seminar two summers ago and the British couple I haven’t spoken to in five years will be spared.

complete article here

Thursday, June 18, 2009

why data confidentiality is a must



As Right People has patented and developped a thechnology that solves the confidentiality problem within social networks, we are very interested into political decisions regarding privacy and user's data protection.

France is ahead with the "Senat" publishing its guideline for the commitee preparing the laws for the next future.

The direction is that the user should be responsible for his data archives, which is exactly what our patent does.

Here is the complete white paper from the french Senat commission.
Here is the summary of the white paper from the french Senat commission.

This has been written to be also a guide line for the european community commission regarding internet privacy.

Thursday, June 11, 2009

Right People to prepare a european fund raising tour



Right People will start next week a one month fund raising tour to close the current fund raising round.

Investors information request here

Wednesday, June 10, 2009

Right People financial analysis updated


Right People financial analysis has been updated and is now available on line.

Right People Financial analysis May 2009.

Why investing now in Right People Technologies?
The answers in the investors brochure.

Investing right now into Right People Technologies means investing into:
1. A company at the very center of the battle of the coming years fought on the Internet and mobile phones: the battle around the search for people.
2. A patented technology that allows the monetization of the booming social networks.
3. A company that, in time of crisis, is turning the enormous social networks market into a mutual aid tool of tremendous efficiency.
4. A company with the potential for becoming a leader in the Internet and mobile phones markets.
5. A company whose major risks are now at bay. The technology is mastered and patented. The product has been delivered. The teams are settled. The company has fulfilled all the financial and legal requirements for public offering. Revenues are coming in.
6. An innovative technology already confirmed by 10 innovation awards including a price from Oseo.
7. A company backed by renowned Senior Advisors and investors.
8. A company in which investment is eligible for FCPI, TEPA, ISF, PEA tax rebates.
9. A company that has already been through a successful IPO, proof of the attention and interest from stock shareholders.

Investment for institutional and qualified private investors only.

Investment brochure here

Should you qualify, you can ask for a subscription form at the current investment conditions and tax deduction papers at investors@rightpeople.mobi

The brochure also explains how french citizens can reduce their ISF taxes due to the TEPA law.

Right People to announce its first revenues



Right Poeple announced its first revenues coming both from Right People for CEOS and Riht People for COnferences and Tradeshows.

Our sale team has closed important deals with pharmaceutial companies and tradeshows organizers.

We expect Right People fo Conferences and Tradeshows to overperform our plans for next year.

Friday, May 29, 2009

why social networks are a goldmine



The Holy Grail of ads: word of mouth


We're on the verge of a major rethinking of advertising's fundamental premises. One of the biggest challenges facing advertisers is ad credibility. Consumers typically rate advertising as their least credible information channel. However, businesses have continued to invest in advertising because they could compensate for the lack of credibility through broad distribution and high-impact messaging.

Today that trade-off is being turned on its head. Word of mouth—peer opinion—has consistently been rated the most credible source of information. But traditionally there's been a limit as to how widely you could distribute a friend's point of view. Readers of a certain age will remember the Fabergé Organics commercial from the 1970s depicting a shampoo user who "told two friends," who in turn "told two friends, and so on, and so on." Three decades ago, telling a lot of friends wasn't nearly as easy as it is now.

Credibility now has a channel for mass distribution. It's called the Web and it particularly thrives in social networks. Such distribution will have profound implications for how we "advertise."

Obviously, we can use social networks to reach friends. But social tools woven into various sites can deliver the opinions and reviews of a group—"people like me"—whose views may be just as credible as those of my friends.

Say I'm a chief information officer. I may find the opinions of fellow CIOs I've never met every bit as credible as the ones I know—perhaps even more so, in that I'm less willing to denigrate the opinions of people I don't know. After all, I know the biases and shortcomings of the people in my friendship circle.

complete article here

Thursday, May 28, 2009

Social networks valuations increasing


As Right People is currently in a fund raising period, it is interesting to see how financial analysts and institutional investors are considering investing in the sector. From Business Week analysts:


"
The guessing games over Facebook's worth are back on again. They were reignited by the news on May 26 that Facebook has accepted a $200 million investment that values the company at $10 billion.

Much of the discussion centers on the ability, or lack thereof, of Facebook and other social networks to sell advertising and deliver advertising results. People get on Facebook to socialize, not hunt for products—or so the argument runs.

But that argument misses the point. The question isn't how advertising will work on Facebook but rather how Facebook and social networks like News Corp.'s (NWS) MySpace are changing advertising. I'm loath to affix the 2.0 moniker to yet another phrase, but if ever an industry needed to be 2.0-ized, it's advertising.

Almost a century ago, retailer John Wannamaker is reported to have said: "Half of all advertising works, I just don't know which half." Today the percentage may be far lower. On the Internet, click-through rates have fallen precipitously as clutter has replaced clarity. These days an ad has performed exceptionally well if at least 1 in 10 people who see it click on it. Much of the time click-through rates that once approached 3% are more like 0.3%. "


complete article here

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Investing into Right People Technologies and taking advantage of ISF tax reductions for French residents



Now is a good time for French residents to benefit from ISF tax reductions while investing into innovation companies. With this in mind, we have published a special brochure outlining the advantages of investing into Right People right now.


Investing right now into Right People Technologies means investing into:


1. A company at the very center of the battle of the coming years fought on the Internet and mobile phones: the battle around the search for people.
2. A patented technology that allows the monetization of the booming social networks.
3. A company that, in time of crisis, is turning the enormous social networks market into a mutual aid tool of tremendous efficiency.
4. A company with the potential for becoming a leader in the Internet and mobile phones markets.
5. A company whose major risks are now at bay. The technology is mastered and patented. The product has been delivered. The teams are settled. The company has fulfilled all the financial and legal requirements for public offering. Revenues are coming in.
6. An innovative technology already confirmed by 10 innovation awards including a price from Oseo.
7. A company backed by renowned Senior Advisors and investors.
8. A company in which investment is eligible for FCPI, TEPA, ISF, PEA tax rebates.
9. A company that has already been through a successful IPO, proof of the attention and interest from stock shareholders.

Investment for institutional and qualified private investors only.

Investment brochure here

Should you qualify, you can ask for a subscription form and tax deduction papers at investors@rightpeople.mobi

Friday, May 22, 2009

UK Survey shows marketers are willing to catch up regarding their usage of social networks


A study into the impact of social media and the way products and services are marketed to us shows that over half of the UK’s top marketing experts are not up to speed with social media and how it works as a marketing and communications tool. Two thirds (65.6%) of marketers in the survey admit they do not have adequate knowledge on how to use social media correctly in marketing.

The McCann Erickson UK Social Media survey conducted by the global agency’s Bristol office shows that whilst 86% of those that took part in the survey acknowledge social media is now here to stay and is not just a fad. Almost half (46%) of the senior marketing professionals that responded admit their companies’ IT department proactively blocks access to popular sites such as Facebook and Twitter – rendering them incapable of effectively monitoring what is being said about their brands. Those that do have access cited Facebook and Twitter as the top two most used social networking sites in the McCann Erickson Social Media index (table 1.0).

Table 1.0 Social media presence – UK Marketing professionals


Social media community / % of marketers with a presence

1. Facebook 72.8%

2. Twitter 42.4%

3. LinkedIn 40.2%

4. YouTube 28.3%

5. Flickr 14.1%

6. Google Groups 12.0%

7. My Space 10.9%

8. Bebo 3.3%

9. Plaxo 1.1%


Source: McCann Erickson UK Social Media in Marketing Survey 2009

The lack of understanding of social media as a marketing tool may explain senior marketers reluctance to grasp its potential. 67.5% of marketers in the survey thought that social media is used more by the youth market (under 25s) however, according to Nielsen, people using Twitter tend to trend older with 35 – 49 year olds making up 42% of traffic to Twitter.com with the majority (62%) accessing it only at work.

Opinion was split on how social media impacts on traditional forms of communication (e.g. telephone and face to face) with 48.2% agreeing that this new form of ‘keeping in touch’ has a negative impact on traditional communication methods versus 51.8% disagreeing.

Three quarters of those questioned (75.9%) did acknowledge that social media has a place in business, commercial communication and marketing activity. Those that are proactive in social media utilisation cite profile raising and PR purposes and their main reasons for use.

complete article here
http://www.mccannbristol.co.uk/news/?p=117

Sunday, May 10, 2009

How Social Networks Are Changing Everything





An interesting article explaining why social networks are set to overtake the big portals , meaning becoming the entrance of the internet.







When we talk about "gateways" to the Web, most of us tick off the names of four Internet companies: Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), Microsoft (MSFT)'s MSN, and Time Warner (TWX)'s AOL. Collectively (with Google in the lead) they account for or broker 90% of the gross dollars advertisers spend online. And they get huge amounts of traffic, in part because millions of users choose one of these four as their home page. Each of the sites continues to draw well over 100 million monthly unique visitors.
But a shift is under way--one that is ushering in the next stage in the battle for influence on the Web. Other players are becoming gateways, too, in a kind of evolutionary advance that will change the way we use the Internet--and alter advertisers' behavior.
The change is taking place on social networking sites, where new applications and cross-site partnerships are turning the likes of Facebook and MySpace into one-stop shops for hundreds of millions of users--platforms from which all the Web's offerings can be reached.




More important, in the next wave of development for such sites, new tools will allow members to take their social-media identities with them when they go to other Web sites. Once wedded to a single networking platform, a member's "social graph"--password, profile, list of friends--is becoming portable. In other words, as they surf the Web, users increasingly will be able to define themselves by their social network of origin.
That's big. It signals that Web companies are no longer in a race to build "destination sites" that attract vast numbers of users. Instead, social networking players are racing to extend their influence over the entire Web by exporting their social features to all sites.
Content, communications, commerce, and search have already ceased to be the unique province of the Big Four. Until recently, only "portals" offered free Web mail. Now MySpace, with its 300 million users, is gearing up to offer e-mail. It also has introduced a toolbar that lets members see "feeds" from friends--accounts of what they're seeing or buying on other Web sites. As for Facebook, having recently surpassed 200 million active users, it offers e-mail, instant messaging, photo posting, and video sharing. Members can also shop online without leaving the site and in some cases (with amazon.com, for instance) communicate with "friends" from their social network about what they're buying. Consider it a social variation on the news feeds provided by Google, Yahoo, and MSN. According to technology blog TechCrunch, such features enabled Facebook to add 40 million users in February alone. It now has 276 million unique monthly visitors--double the traffic of any of the Big Four portals, including Google.
As usage shifts to these networks, a social overlay is spreading across the Web. To varying degrees, Facebook Connect and MySpaceID both allow members to explore the Web using their social-network passwords and, in some cases, to chat with "friends" they find on nonsocial sites. Portals are doing their best to catch up. Google has Friend Connect, and Microsoft has a similar feature in its new Windows Live package of online services. Even ailing AOL is trying to get into the game, with portable "lifestreaming" (real-time updates from friends) and chat.
All these technologies make a user's social context portable to all sites. And this promises to transform the Web experience. Users are already asking questions about the privacy and ownership of their social-media profiles. That debate is likely to heat up. Advertisers, meanwhile, may eventually stop buying specific ad space on the Web and go after users, wherever they pop up, based on their social profiles and networks. And Internet companies? As this social Web emerges, the players that own and harness social applications will be positioned to reshape the Web in ways we can only imagine today. Google's oft-cited mission has been "to organize the world's information." The new goal is to organize the world's people.
Jeffrey F. Rayport is founder and chairman of Marketspace, a digital strategy and customer experience practice affiliated with Monitor Group. Rayport was previously a faculty member at Harvard Business School.









complete article here






Friday, May 1, 2009

Current sucess criteria for our market



This article from "Advertising Age" analyzes what currently works. It pinpoints what advertisers want in those times of crisis. It is interesting to see that Right People strategy is fully aligned with the major tips it contains.

Here is an abstract:
In a Time of Crisis, Sexy and Flashy Doesn't Count

Marketers consistently pick up their best lessons in times of crisis. We think differently about ROI. We act more intuitively. We become more agile and flexible. We "sense and respond." We really don't have much of a choice but to act and not allow yesterday's rules to justify complacency.

It enlights four key points for sucess:
- Empower Those Who Want to Help Others
- Make Search Really, Really Simple and Accessible
- Syndicate the Message
- Communicate in Multiple Languages


The name of the game of this article is to demonstrate that these benefits, which are among those of Right People platform, are what marketers and advertisers are currently looking for.

. Empower Those Who Want to Help Others
Right People transforms social networks into powerful mutual assistance tools.
. Make Search Really, Really Simple and Accessible
We have succeeded into creating a sophisticated search engine for persons that is as easy to use as 1-2-3.
. Syndicate the Message
All information and messages are aggregated.
. Communicate in Multiple Languages
Right People allow users to communicate through all existing channels, such as their desktop computer, their laptop, their regular mobile phone, or their iPhone.

Complete article here

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Thank you



This is an official "Thank You" to the team for having delivered Right People for Individuals on time.

This is the biggest "Thank you" that I have ever sent, because I am aware of the pressure the team has been working under for many months.

This is a public "Thank You" to a team that I qualify today as "the Dream Team".



This "Thank You" is obviously primarily dedicated to our CTO, delivering every product in time, from Right People for the President, through Right People for CEOs, Right People for Conferences and Tradeshows, and now Right Pople for Individuals.

Thank you to our Chief Architect for having found the sophisticated algorythms of the powerful Right People search engine.



This "Thank You" is also dedicated to our ergonomist, designers, developers.

And at the end of the process, "Thank You" to our User Satisfaction Manager and our COO who conducted every test of the platform.

Sunday, April 26, 2009

Right People for iPhones has been delivered



Right People for iPhones has been delivered.

Right People for iPhones will first be connected to Right People for Conferences and Tradeshows and will be extended to all other product ranges.

Right People for iPhones works worldwide.
We are proud to be part of the booming of iPhone's new behaviors.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

Right People for Mobile Phones has been delivered



Right People for Mobile Phones has been delivered, two days in advance.

Right People for Mobile Phones will first be connected to Right People for Conferences and Tradeshows and will be extended to all the other product ranges.

Right People for Mobile Phones works on any mobile phone.
No specific software or download necessary.
Even an old vintage phone can use it.

Friday, April 3, 2009

Investing into Right People Technologies and taking advantage of ISF tax reductions for French residents



Now is a good time for French residents to benefit from ISF tax reductions while investing into innovation companies. With this in mind, we have published a special brochure outlining the advantages of investing into Right People right now.


Investing right now into Right People Technologies means investing into:


1. A company at the very center of the battle of the coming years fought on the Internet and mobile phones: the battle around the search for people.
2. A patented technology that allows the monetization of the booming social networks.
3. A company that, in time of crisis, is turning the enormous social networks market into a mutual aid tool of tremendous efficiency.
4. A company with the potential for becoming a leader in the Internet and mobile phones markets.
5. A company whose major risks are now at bay. The technology is mastered and patented. The product has been delivered. The teams are settled. The company has fulfilled all the financial and legal requirements for public offering. Revenues are coming in.
6. An innovative technology already confirmed by 10 innovation awards including a price from Oseo.
7. A company backed by renowned Senior Advisors and investors.
8. A company in which investment is eligible for FCPI, TEPA, ISF, PEA tax rebates.
9. A company that has already been through a successful IPO, proof of the attention and interest from stock shareholders.

Investment for institutional and qualified private investors only.

Right People brochure for investors

The complete brochure for investors can be downloaded here.

Investment for institutional and qualified private investors.

Friday, March 27, 2009

Social network ad spending is taking a hit from the worldwide economic crisis




Social network ad spending is taking a hit from the worldwide economic crisis and the ongoing challenge of developing effective ad models. Marketers will spend an estimated $2.35 billion to advertise on social networks worldwide in 2009, a 17% increase from 2008 levels.Though a double-digit increase during a recession is a good sign, the reality is that it is half of the growth rate eMarketer had previously projected.

Marketers spent an estimated $2 billion to advertise on social network Websites worldwide in 2008, eMarketer estimates. In 2009, spending is expected to increase 17%, to $2.35 billion. A double-digit rise in spending is certainly good news at a time when forecasters are shrinking their worldwide online ad spending projections to the low single digits. But the expected growth in social network spending in 2009 is half of what eMarketer had projected it would be in their previous forecast in December 2007.



Emarketers Research 2009.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

Advertising budgets towards social networks



"In order to be successful, brands have to have dedicated strategy and programs to make these [venues] work like their other marketing vehicles," Forrester analyst Jeremiah Owyang said.

The good news: Even with the economy in recession, a majority of marketers -- 53 percent -- said they expected to increase spending on social media. Just 5 percent said they would decrease spending and 42 percent said their outlays would remain the same. (Forrester did not ask marketers to specify if they were including ad programs on social sites.)

"Social media is new so marketers are trying to pull budgets out of other areas," said Owyang. "It's very early days for most marketers."

Owyang pointed to less quantitative signs that social media is moving up the chain at major companies. Speaking from the South by Southwest conference in Austin, Texas, he noted the presence of major marketers like H&R Block, Coke and Microsoft. Pepsi has more than 10 employees at the conference and is sponsoring several events.

"That's very different from two years ago," he said. "It's clear they want to be educated on social media marketing."

Forrester's research is based on interviews with 145 interactive marketers, nearly three quarters of which work at companies with over 1,000 employees. The survey was conducted between November 2008 and February 2009.

Among the areas the majority of respondents tabbed for increases, social networking led the way with 70 percent stating they planned to boost budgets. Over half said they planned to spend more on blogs and user-generated content.

From Forrester Research - 2009.

Monday, March 23, 2009

New features for Right People for Conferences and Tradeshows



Attendees and visitors are now able to search for the Right People, according to new filters about:
- company search
- role search
- position search
- country search
- products/services search

These new features give conferences and tradeshows organizers a full range of networking capabilities for their customers.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Social networks are now for people aged 35-45

Source: Nielsen Online, Global Index, December 2007 – December 2008.

Not just for teenagers anymore. Now for adults.

The social network audience is becoming more encompassing As an entity moves from being niche to a major player the composition, or make-up, of its audience changes. Social networks online started out amongst the younger audience. However, as the networks have become more mainstream with the passage of time, it isn’t surprising to see the audience becoming broader and older. This shift has primarily been driven by Facebook, whose successful formula (page 9) opened up the possibilities of social networking to a much wider audience. In terms of sheer audience numbers, for example, the greatest growth for Facebook has come from people aged 35-49 years of age (+24.1 million). Furthermore, Facebook has added almost twice as many 50-64 year olds visitors (+13.6 million) than it has added under 18 year old visitors (+7.3 million). Consequently, people under 18 years old are making up less of the social network and blogging audience, whereas the 50+ age group are accounting for more of the audience.

Monday, March 16, 2009

Social network and blogging sites are now the fourth most popular activity on the Internet




‘Member Communities’ now reach over 5 percentage points more of the Internet population than it did a year ago – a growth rate more than twice that of any of the other four largest sectors. The strongest growth has come in Germany where the sector now reaches 51% of Germans online compared to 39% a year ago – an actual increase of over 12 percentage points. Large growth has also occurred in the UK, Spain, Italy and Switzerland – the sector reaching 10% percentage points more of the online population in each of these countries than it did a year ago.





Source: Nielsen Online, Global Index, December 2007 – December 2008.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

How social networks are creating a potentially transformational change in consumer behaviour


A powerful survey from Nielsen explains how social networks are deeply changing our day-to-day habits.

Social Networking has been the global consumer phenomenon of 2008.
Two-thirds of the world’s Internet population1 visit a social network or blogging site and the sector now accounts for almost 10% of all internet time. ‘Member Communities’ has overtaken personal Email to become the world’s fourth most popular online sector after search, portals and PC software applications.
The story is consistent across the world,‘Member Communities’ has taken a foothold in every major market from 50% of the online population in Switzerland and Germany to 80% in Brazil. Facebook has become the largest player on the global stage, dominant in many countries, yet localised offerings have won the day in many others. However, the growth in popularity of social networks – and the resultant broadening audience – is only half the story. The staggering increase in the amount of time people are spending on these sites is changing the way people spend their time online and has ramifications for how people behave, share and interact within their normal daily lives. Consequently, the global media and advertising industries are faced with new challenges around the opportunities and risks this new consumer medium creates. Social networks provide competition to traditional publishers for consumer attention and at the same time, facilitate new ways for publishers and advertisers to connect with their audiences. So how do they need to change their strategies accordingly? Consumer engagement within social networks has the potential to change the way consumers are targeted, not just through the digital medium, but through all forms of traditional media. Whilst a few billion dollars of ad revenue can’t be wrong, the prevailing wisdom is that the current level of advertising activity on social networks isn’t consummate with the size – and highly engaged levels – of the audience.


... to be continued...

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Data confidentiality is a key issue for the future of social networks



Right People has developped and patented a technology that protects social network users against privacy abuses and that gives them a total control over their personal data while using socia networks; this article show how important this issue might become very soon.


Facebook backs off changes to terms of service
The founder of Facebook says the social networking website will return to its previous terms of service regarding user data, after critics complained recent changes had eroded user privacy.

Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook's founder and CEO, wrote early Wednesday morning that move back to the previous terms is temporary, and comes in response to questions and comments the website has received about changes made two weeks ago.

"Based on this feedback, we have decided to return to our previous terms of use while we resolve the issues that people have raised," he wrote in the company's official blog.


Facebook had changed its terms of service on Feb. 4, deleting a paragraph that allowed its 175 million users to remove content from the site at any time.

Zuckerberg said in a Monday blog post the changes were made to reflect how account holders use the site.

When a user shares a message on Facebook with a friend, a copy of the content remains in the friend's inbox, he said. This content remains, regardless of whether the sender has deactivated his or her account or not.

The change touched off a storm of criticism from blogs, users and consumer advocates accusing Facebook of undermining user privacy. Facebook users have also created groups voicing opposition to the changes.

"Make sure you never upload anything you don't feel comfortable giving away forever, because it's Facebook's now," consumer advocacy website the Consumerist said in a post on Sunday.

Zuckerberg said in his Wednesday blog post the website is committed to making changes to the terms of service to reflect how people share and control their information, and said "it will be written in a language everyone can understand."

Zuckerberg said users will have input into how these changes take shape, and said users can post comments and questions on a group created within the website called Facebook Bill of Rights and Responsibilities.

Complete article here.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Social networks facts and figures





The US analysts company, eMarketer has just released its updated analysis about social networks.

These figures give a clear view of the market trends.







The social networking audience is growing rapidly.

eMarketer estimates that in 2008 nearly 80 million people, 41% of the US Internet user population, visited social network sites at least once a month, an 11% increase from 2007.

By 2013, an estimated 52% of Internet users will be regular social network visitors.



“The steady stream of social network updates and news is now a weekly—or even daily—habit for many online users,” says Debra Aho Williamson, eMarketer senior analyst and author of the new report, Social Networks: Five Consumer Trends for 2009. “That stickiness is good news for social networks.”

Good news because social networks have yet to develop viable revenue models. But there is still time.

“Social network usage is not tapering off—it is growing,” Ms. Williamson says. “Not only are more consumers joining social networks, but their level of involvement is deepening.”

The majority of social network users have profiles.

eMarketer projects that 79.7 million people, 40% of US Internet users, will create content on social networks at least once a month in 2009, either by updating a profile or communicating publicly.




That represents 90.5% of social network users—and a lot of stickiness.

It is no secret that the social networking audience has grown rapidly.

In 2008, 79.5 million people—41% of the US Internet user population—visited social network sites at least once a month, an 11% increase over the previous year.

“More users are more involved with social networking now than ever before,” says Ms. Williamson.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Right People launches Right People for Conferences and Tradeshows




Conferences and Tradeshows are primarily selling networking opportunities. Just imagine the accelerating impact of allowing participants to start networking as soon as they have paid their registration fees. Months or weeks in advance, they have a reason to pay for their attendance, far prior to the date of the event.

This is what Right People has just revealed today: the most powerful networking tool for conferences and tradehows.

If you are a conference or tradeshow organizer, you may contact our sales team to customize Right People networking tool for your event.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Right People is now eligible for FCPI funds investments



Right People Technologies is now eligible for FCPI investments.



We have just received our OSEO FCPI agreement.

Sunday, February 8, 2009

With ad budgets declining, marketers focus on targeting




This interesting article from the Wall Street Journal describes the accelerating trend of advertising investment into targeted advertising.


As marketers scale back their ad budgets, some new technologies that make it easier for marketers to track the impact of their online advertising are gaining ground.
Products based on these technologies -- such as customized ads that show different products to different users, Web ads hidden inside links in text, and online coupons -- are part of what is called "performance-driven advertising." That's because the products aim to improve and more precisely measure how a particular ad performs.
While no one format is likely to emerge as a silver bullet for marketers seeking to use their ad dollars more efficiently, the advertising industry is betting on these technologies to increase online advertising spending. Altogether, the U.S. online-ad market is expected to increase 9% to $25.7 billion in 2009, slowing from its year-earlier growth rate 11%.
Internet retailer Overstock.com is becoming a big user of performance-driven ad products. The Salt Lake City company is planning to spend about $15 million, or 20% of its overall marketing budget for this year, on personalized ads from Choicestream, which makes product-recommendation software, says Overstock Chief Executive Patrick Byrne.

An in-text ad by Vibrant for Chrysler's Dodge Ram pickup. Such ads appear when a computer user's mouse hovers over a link embedded in a Web page.

To devise the personalized ads, which Overstock started testing a few months ago, Choicestream relies on data the retailer provides about what customers browse and purchase on its site. Choicestream uses the data to select what personalized products and offers to insert into Overstock ads as they appear to potential customers browsing the Web.
Mr. Byrne says that while Overstock hasn't had much luck with online display advertising in the past, the new, personalized ads drove a sevenfold increase in clicks on the ads and a threefold increase in sales relative to other display ads. "We are ramping it up as quickly as we can," he says.
Internet giant Yahoo and Teracent, which develops online display-ad technology for clients like Hewlett-Packard, offer customized ad products similar to Choicestream's. Yahoo's version, called Smart Ads, debuted in 2007. Michael Walrath, a senior vice president at Yahoo, says demand for Smart Ads has grown during the economic downturn, even though fourth-quarter revenue was relatively flat from the previous year. A new Yahoo service that allows advertisers to target their display ads to users who have searched for particular terms has also gotten a good reception, he says.
Advertisers' "budgets may be reduced, but the expectations of driving business aren't being reduced," adds Mr. Walrath.
Companies like Choicestream, Yahoo and Teracent hope to steal some thunder from search advertising, which remains one of the biggest and fastest-growing ad formats. Since search ads are related to what a person is searching for on the Web, consumers often find them more relevant than other ads, and advertisers typically find them more cost effective.
But as budgets tighten, other formats that can prove they are worth their price are gaining momentum too. Coupons Inc., which makes software to help companies create and distribute online coupons, is among the companies that are benefiting. It has seen a recent surge in interest from advertisers looking for more cost-effective online marketing options, says CEO Steven Boal. Mr. Boal says the company expects to issue $1 billion in coupons this year, up from $300 million last year, and is drawing new customers who appreciate that they pay for the service only when a consumer prints out a coupon.
Committed revenue for the year at Vibrant, which creates in-text ads, has doubled from a year ago, says the company's CEO and co-founder Doug Stevenson. In-text ads appear when a computer user hover a mouse over links that appear in the text on a Web page. Vibrant charges advertisers only when someone clicks on their ads.
The new ad formats are winning over some big marketers. Over the past year, auto maker Chrysler, whose brands include Dodge and Jeep, has shifted its online-ad spending away from lifestyle sites to sites, such as Edmunds.com, that are geared toward consumers who are in the market for a car, as well as toward performance-driven products like Vibrant's in-text ads. Chrysler is also continuing to spend on search ads, says Chuck Sullivan, director of interactive at Chrysler.
"The good news about the performance-based media is that it's very easy to track, and we are able to see what works and what doesn't work," Mr. Sullivan says.
Chrysler says the shift has paid off: The percentage of total retail sales attributed to online leads rose two percentage points in 2008 from the prior year.

Complete article here.

Thursday, February 5, 2009

Where data confidentiality is more and more an issue



As Right People has patented and is developing a solution to avoid data confidentiality issues within social networks, this episode shows the growing need for taking data privacy in consideration.

Stormy reactions arose when the Guardian and the Telegraph disclosed that Facebook would go through new steps of monetization of its users database. Facebook had to react and send a response.

Here's the articles extract:
Facebook is planning to exploit the vast amount of personal information it holds on its 150m members by creating one of the world’s largest market research databases.

That’s how this Telegraph article kicks off in a report that was widely quoted by a ton of tech news sites and blogs. Sure enough, the article was based on an interview with Randi Zuckerberg, Facebook’s Global Markets Director and Mark Zuckerberg’s sister.

Here’s Facebook’s response:

“The polls run at the World Economic Forum were not part of a commercially available product for advertisers and should not be confused with Facebook’s Engagement Ads. At WEF, Facebook ran a series of polls to provide the Davos audience with real-time insight into the opinions of people outside of the conference. These polls were conducted on Facebook using internal tools.

Engagement Ads have been available since September and take five different forms. Most recently, Facebook began testing an Engagement Ad where advertisers can pose a question within the ad itself.

Facebook has, for many years, allowed the targeting of advertising in a non-personally identifiable way, based on profile attributes. Nothing has changed in our approach, and Facebook is committed, as always, to connecting users in a trusted environment.”

Facebook aims to market its user data bank to businesses

Facebook intends to capitalise on the wealth of information it has about its users by offering its 150 million-strong customer base to corporations as a market research tool. The appearance, later this year, of corporate polls targeted at certain parts of the Facebook audience because of the information they have posted on their pages, is likely to infuriate privacy campaigners.
Last week Mark Zuckerberg, the company's 24-year-old founder and chief executive, showed the audience at the World Economic Forum in Davos how the social networking site could be used to poll specific groups of users.
He asked users in Palestine and then Israel about peace issues before relaying the results back to the audience within minutes. He also polled more than 100,000 American users of the website, asking them whether they thought President Obama's fiscal stimulus package would be enough to resurrect the economy. Two out of five said it was not enough.
Giving consumer brands the chance to use such a wide audience to get a quick response to targeted questions would do away with, or at least reduce their reliance on, expensive and time-consuming focus groups.
Speaking to well known tech blogger Robert Scoble at the event, Zuckerberg said 2009 will be Facebook's "intense" year as it tries to justify some of the mammoth valuations that have been placed upon it by making some serious revenues through advertising. He was even seen sporting a tie, a sartorial extra which the Harvard drop-out has so far eschewed.
He added the company has been experimenting with analysis of user sentiment, tracking the mood of its audience through what they are doing online. Such information is potentially very interesting to large brands, which are always seeking to measure what their customers think about their own or competitors' products.
Facebook's advertising technology already allows advertisers to choose which sort of customer will see their ­display adverts when they log on to the site. Advertisers can choose from such ­categories as where the user is located and their age and gender, based upon what the user has uploaded on to Facebook – which is adding about 450,000 new users a day.
Last year, Facebook launched its Engagement Ads tool, which allows advertisers to publish a poll on people's home pages. They are then able to see how their friends and other Facebook users have voted. The polls, which can include actions such as watching and rating a movie trailer, are being tested by companies including AT&T and CareerBuilder.com.
The American recruitment website tonight used its trial Facebook polls to ask people what they thought of the advert that was played during the coverage of the 43rd Super Bowl. The first widespread use of polls is expected in the spring.
Facebook also has a tool called Facebook Lexicon, which is a bit like Google Trends, in that it allows users to track what topics are being discussed by people on Facebook. While Google Trends uses the search terms that are entered into its site, Facebook Lexicon looks at one of the most visible parts of a user's profile page – their wall, where people and their friends exchange public messages. It provides a searchable database of trends over time, showing how the incidence of particular words or phrases has increased or decreased in wall posts.
Facebook Lexicon shows that the company already has a significant database of user information which it could exploit and the tools are in place to allow companies to use its information for market research purposes.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/feb/01/facebook-seeks-to-exploit-user-information

Advertising revenues trends within social networks


Facebook's Plan to Amp Up Ad Revenue


NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Think Facebook's 15 minutes are just about up? Well, one in five web users in the world is saying otherwise. Facebook lured 222 million unique visitors in December, according to ComScore, twice as many as MySpace, and it has been growing at a more than 10% rate each month since September.
Until now, Facebook has focused on growth at the expense of advertising, much like YouTube circa 2007. MySpace, on the other hand, wasn't born in a Harvard dorm room and is run like a profit center for Rupert Murdoch, one reason it's expected to book around $1 billion in ad revenue in 2008, compared with Facebook's estimated $300 million.


complete article here

Monday, February 2, 2009

Social networks now considered to be essential: Davos World Economic Form



The World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, this year, broadened its discussions by inviting major social networks as part of the strategical discussions about the crisis recovery and the key challenges of the planet.

Social networks are now considered to be as powerful as traditional media.
Not any more gadgets, or dedicated to teenagers, they demonstrated that they already are powerful key media, in particular while serving the Obama successful campaign as Facebook and Right People for the President did.

Thursday, January 29, 2009

More about Right People new corporate website

New preview.
Coming soon.


When crisis boosts social networks' revenues





In thoses times of crisis, sales of targeted advertising through social networks are growing at the expense of traditional advertising media. Myspace has just revealed revenues superior to $1Billion.

Here is an interesting article from the Financal Times:



Chris DeWolfe is dashing around his Beverly Hills office. The co-founder of MySpace is preparing to go to Davos, where he will rub shoulders with leaders of the world economy, including his boss, Rupert Murdoch.

Davos this year is packed with gloomy-sounding sessions on the collapse of global capitalism but Mr DeWolfe is in an upbeat mood. MySpace has fine-tuned its advertising model and as it celebrates its fifth birthday he believes the site can prove its critics wrong about the durability and profit-making potential of social networking.

With their millions of users, social media has long been seen as a panacea of online advertising. But sites such as Facebook and MySpace, which is part of News Corp, have been unable to turn those users into significant profits. MySpace narrowly missed a $1bn revenue target last year, while Facebook has preferred to concentrate on building a large base of users.

By Mr DeWolfe says a relentless focus on profits at MySpace is starting to pay off. "From day one we have always been focused on building a really big, scaleable business that is based on advertising," he says. "If you are a big brand and you want to reach any demographic you can get real scale on MySpace."

The group has devised a hybrid business model that combines big branding campaigns on the popular pages with its ability to "hyper-target" millions of users according to their interests.

The big, more general advert campaigns are a recent factor: MySpace has introduced branding on its home page, which is seen by more than 50m users daily. "That's more people than watch American Idol ," says Mr DeWolfe. Such campaigns used to be found only on portal sites, such as Yahoo, AOL and MSN but Mr DeWolfe says MySpace has those companies in its sights.

This is partly because MySpace has built a sufficient user base to compete for what is a much larger pot of money. "In the early days, either the brands or their media buyers would reserve a small part of their buy for social media sites - the rest would go to the portal sites," he explains. "But what has happened is that we are now competing against offline media and the big portals, such as Yahoo and AOL."

Analysts say this move to a hybrid model that combines the penetration of social media with the broad reach of a portal site could be decisive. "MySpace is going to be more attractive to advertisers because they have created these 'safe havens' where advertisers can put their brands," says Richard Greenfield, an analyst with Pali Research.

The home page branding comes a year after the site launched its "hyper targeting model". Mr DeWolfe says the move does not represent a strategic U-turn and instead gives the site the best of both worlds.

He points to the more than 1,000 "enthusiast groups" on MySpace as being appealing for advertisers keen to target their products at niche demographics. "We have also built a product that reaches small and medium-sized businesses that represent billions of dollars in potential ad revenue."

One user - a roofer in Chicago - turned a MySpace advert offer costing a few hundred dollars into a $30,000 roofing deal. "There has been no easy way for people like that to advertise online other than buying big display ads or by buying text ads on Google. But more than 15,000 have used our product to create graphical advertising."

With the economy crashing and advertisers reining in their spending, maintaining momentum is going to be difficult, although he says first-half sales rose 16 per cent on last year. "Where the next six months are going is hard to say because the economy is changing so quickly. But I think we are in a much better position than most of the other [online] companies formed in the past five years."

Complete article here

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

Right People and the President of the USA

As Right People took part in helping the new President Barack Obama, we hereafter publish the result of this amazing campaign, this amazing event: the inauguration of the 44th President of the United States. And for those who did not have the opportunity to watch the inaugural speech, .. it is worth a look!

Monday, January 19, 2009

Right People new corporate website








For your eyes only...

A preview of the brand new Right People corporate website.
To be released very soon...

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Social Networks Among Trends in CRM for 2009


Customer relationship management (CRM) projects in 2009 will be all about business value, and that includes adding social networks to the mix, according to a report from analyst firm Forrester Research.

An increased emphasis on business value will see enterprises focusing on customer retention and creating dynamic solutions to support customer facing processes.

"During this economic downturn, customers tell us they need bulletproof financial arguments to get funding for their projects," William Band, Forrester vice president and principal analyst, said in the report.

Another way to improve customer experience will be to incorporate social networking capabilities in CRM applications, and Forrester predicts that enterprises will begin doing this in 2009.



Complete article here

Friday, January 9, 2009

Social networks are solutions to the current crisis


Social networks such as Linked-In and Facebook have long been used for developing personal and professional connections online. However, in the wake of rampant job losses, the recruitment potential of the sites has skyrocketed, bolstered by increasing functionality and reach.

“I think we've only just scratched the surface of using social networking for job hunting,” said Matt Hicks, a spokesperson for Facebook. “People are now going beyond their direct network and reaching that next layer of people that may have an interest in getting a job with your company, but may be hard to reach through traditional media.”

The fact that many more people are out of work today than this time last year also means that more people are searching. The stock market's nosedive prompted a tornado of job losses that left 533,000 people without jobs in the month of November alone.

Jerry Bernhart, principal at Bernhart Associates, which along with the Direct Marketing Association publishes the Quarterly Direct Marketing Employment Survey, said the survey saw the biggest one-quarter drop in its eight-year history in October, and 17% of direct marketing firms surveyed were planning layoffs.

To put the link between professional social networking and the economy in perspective, US traffic to employment sites has increased 20% across the board over the past 13 weeks, compared with the same time period in 2007, according to Hitwise. Traffic to LinkedIn has increased 174%.

Job seekers aren't the only ones benefiting from the social networks. Using these sites can give employers an upper hand when getting to know their candidates, according to Jeremiah Owyang, a senior analyst at Forrester Research. He notes that companies using Facebook have the ability to create interactive pages that can focus on recruiting, such as one created by Ernst & Young.

“The marketers can then gain access to see what these [prospective employees] are doing, what photos they're uploading on Saturday morning and how they communicate with others. [They are] checking the behavior, not just the resume,” Owyang said, “These are telling tools that help you understand how these people will behave once you hire them.”

Additionally, Bernhart notes that on sites like LinkedIn, which touts its Jobs Insider tool that allows users to see their connections at companies that have job postings on major listing sites across the Web, users must create profiles that all their connections can see.


On a survey done by DMNews:
How did you fing your last job?
5% said by a recruiter
55% by an online ad
30% referred by a friend
10% using a social network online
meaning that 40% is done by offline or online social networks.


Complete article here

Thursday, January 8, 2009

2009 will be the year of the Right People




Happy new year to all Right People fans and friends.

Thursday, December 25, 2008


Wednesday, December 24, 2008

Merry xmas to all Right People fans and friends



will be back in 2009!

:)

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Right People Technologies launches today the first technology that unleashes the “wisdom of the crowds” for CEOs.

RightPeople Technologies following in the footsteps of Right People for the President launches today RightPeople for CEOs.
Right People for CEOs allows CEOs to find Billion dollar ideas in the haystack. The technology used by Right People for CEOs will give CEOs direct feedback from employees and customers on major corporate goals.
Right People for CEOs can be implemented in a simple cut and paste operation, with no need for IT development. This tool will be accessible by any employees and customers worldwide through the company’s existing communication channels. Right People for the CEOs is extremely easy to use and customize.
Employees and customers will trust and use a solution that allows them to openly and easily communicate with the CEO. CEOs will be able to immediately create an atmosphere where any employee and customer feels involved, thus strengthening the reputation of the CEO and of the company.
Right People for CEOs allows CEOs to instantly and efficiently view the best ideas generated by employees and customers. These ideas will be pre-filtered, evaluated and ranked by the Right People filtering and evaluation tool.
Right People for CEOs helps CEOs get an expanded view and keep their fingers on the pulse of the enterprise.
Right People for CEOs is the only solution that solves ALL of the shortcomings of existing products.
Dan Ake, Right People CEO explains: “We created Right People for CEOs because, as we all know, the best ideas in corporations come from the ground and we wanted to give CEOs a tool that helps them easily capture the knowledge of employees and customers. Right People for the CEOs gives companies an immediate and simple way to answer, in a positive way, employees’ need to be listened to. ”.
This brand new application from Right People’s search platform is now available online here through a dedicated website as well as numerous business sites and blogs.

Right People for CEOs is now available for big corporations




As we all know, the best ideas in corporations come from the ground i.e. from employees and customers. Adwords, the engine of Google’s spectacular growth is an idea that did not originate in the mind of Larry, Sergei or Eric Schmidt. Adwords was an employee idea: Salar Kamangar’s idea.

Right People for CEOs is a powerful knowledge management tool designed to capture billion dollar ideas from the ground. Any company can install it in a single copy and paste. CEOs are no able to instantly and efficiently view the best ideas generated by employees and customers. These ideas are pre-filtered, evaluated and ranked by the Right People filtering and evaluation engine.



Our VP of Sales mentions that every single one of the CEOs he meets tells him of multi-million dollar or even billion dollar quarters that were the direct result of the adoption of an employee or customer idea.

"Until today, companies have not been able to systematically capture feedback from employees and customers. Existing tools: suggestions boxes (physical or virtual), town hall meetings, customer/employee councils, employee surveys have done a mediocre job of allowing employees and customers to openly and easily communicate with the CEO. Right People for CEOs is the ONLY solution that solves ALL of the shortcomings of existing products", he said.

For a demo of how Right People for CEOs can help your enterprise, or to customize Right People for CEOs for your company, contact our Sales Department here

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

Mobile advertising initiation



As Right People technology works on any mobile device and is at the center of the advertising game, we are very interested by the movement forward that Google is initiating in mobile advertising.

Is the mobile Web converging with the sedentary one? Google apparently thinks so.

The search giant has begun distributing AdWords campaigns to handheld devices with full HTML browsers -- beginning with Apple's iPhone and its own touch screen handheld, the G1 from T-Mobile.

Google says these phones can handle standard AdWords ads and landing pages without requiring modification or other special action by marketers, and it believes extending advertisers' reach in this way only makes sense. "Last year, we released a metric that the iPhone delivered 50 times the number of searches any other mobile platform [did]," said a Google spokesperson. "A lot of people are searching on these things."

But he added Google did not have ready statistics on how its users interact with search ads on these devices. To allow marketers to better measure the impact of the change on their campaigns, Google is offering performance reporting broken out by device.

Additionally, AdWords advertisers can create campaigns targeted exclusively to iPhone and G1 owners. Separate calls to action can be created for all mobile users, or even for the users of individual devices. That approach might be desirable for marketers of iPhone or other mobile apps, or for the makers of device accessories.

According to M:Metrics, 68 percent of iPhone owners use the device to conduct searches. Meanwhile, 40 percent of owners of devices with HTML browsers use them for searching, and 10 percent of people with any device type do so. ComScore-owned M:Metrics said it does not have enough data to measure the search patterns of G1 device owners.

Campaigns will be distributed to iPhone and G1 browsers by default. To turn the capability on or off, AdWords users must visit the Networks and bidding section of the campaign interface and check or uncheck the box next to "iPhones and other mobile devices with full Internet browsers." Marketers using Google's pre-existing mobile ad formats will not be affected by the change.

Complete article here.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Right People investors presentation at AlwaysOn Summit Silicon Valley

Our Marketing VP and Sales VP on the last round before lauching our second product



Last tuning before the official launching of "Right People for CEOS".

What a professional event!

Yesterday as I was preparing our presentation, I discovered that we would have 6 minutes to present, "including set-up". You can imagine how hard it was to present Right People from A to Z in already just 10 minutes.So there it was to be 6 minutes.

So I was a little nervous yesterday night. I rehearsed twice.

I must admit I was impressed this morning, by the AlwaysOn Summit Silicon Valley. While only the speakers have had the chance to see the backstage organization.

Just imagine that speakers had to wait in the "Speakers ready room" 45 min before the panel. There a staff member gave us the last details for presenting, while a video technician connected your computer, tested it in a testing environment backstage.



Then you were assigned a wireless microphone, each of us having our own. Then we all rehearsed in the exact same order as we would have to speak.


As I noted, the "Speakers ready room" had "the" view that would give anyone the power to change the world.



Then you were called backstage in the last five minutes, and called to jump on stage like a rock star!


And it worked!
Above is the video of this 6 minute presentation of Right People.

Monday, December 1, 2008

Right People has been selected as one the "the hottest companies" in the sector "Consumer and Media" at AlwaysOn summit Silicon Valley



And it starts tomorrow!

Venture Summit Silicon Valley 2008 Current Program & Invited Speakers:

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

11:15am
CEO Presentations -- Consumer & Media
Presentations by CEOs of the hottest companies in this sector,
emceed by Ezra Roizen, Contributing Editor, AlwaysOn.
Jason E. Barkeloo, CEO, Somatic Digital
Avtar Khalsa, CEO, Stiki
John Ham, CEO, Ustream.TV
Dan Ake, CEO, RightPeople
Scott Morrow, CEO, ThisNext
Jan Eglen, CEO, Digonex Technologies
Anu Shukla, CEO, Offerpal Media
Charles Delamain , CEO, Social Go

Welcome on 2225 East Bayshore Palo Alto



Jena-Michel Billaut, Bertrand Gerard-Boucheny and I were proud to welcome the second wave of new employees at 2225 East Bayshore, Palo Alto, in our new offices in Silicon Valley.

24H/7 or 24H/6 for Right People?



We welcomed last week our first two team members from Poland and France working with the marketing and sales teams to tune launching schedules.

That was their first time in Silicon Valley and they just had only seen the airport, the hotel, and the offices for the past ten days. So yesterday we decided to have them experience a Sunday in the Bay Area.
They discovered the Golden Gate Bridge and other typical should-know San Francisco places.

Sunday, November 30, 2008

Right People innovatice concept on LCI TV and DowJones Eurotech feedback

The DowJones Eurotech showcase was very effective for us.
We were presented to the major decision-makers in the Silicon Valley. We had one-to-one appointments with ten of them who asked for a 10mn interview with us.
Things were at a top-level of professionalism.

After 1Omns, they decided whether they wanted to go further or not.
We are now arranging the second meetings with them.
To be followed...

Thursday, November 27, 2008

Growth of profit, or growth and profit, for social networks



Here is an intersting article comparing the (official?) strategies of Facebook and Myspace. One is focused on growth, the other one is focused on profits.
Right People is definitely focused on both!

Facebook's Land Grab in the Face of a Downturn
The social-networking site is moving aggressively to sign up more users around the world while much of Silicon Valley hunkers down

As gloom descends on Silicon Valley, most startups and giants are growing cautious and cutting back. But not Facebook. The social-networking Web site sees a bleak economy as all the more reason to press ahead with aggressive plans for growth. "This is not the time for tech companies to be cutting back; this is the time to be hitting the accelerator," says Peter Thiel, a Facebook board member and investor.



Facebook executives think they can use the economic downturn to gain ground on the competition. So they're going to great lengths to keep user growth on track in these rough times. The company is gearing up for more acquisitions, hiring rapidly, and rolling out new advertising programs. Rather than trim the site's development costs, Facebook has engineers cooking up versions in languages such as Xhosa, Tagalog, and French Canadian to go after niche audiences around the world. "We're in this game not just for five or 10 years," says Sheryl Sandberg, Facebook's chief operating officer. "We're in it for 20 to 30 years."

To fuel growth, the company asked the Securities & Exchange Commission earlier this year for an unusual exemption. Typically, private companies that exceed 500 shareholders must start disclosing their financial results publicly. (This is the law that helped push Google to go public in 2004.) Facebook is approaching that threshold, so the company asked the SEC for a waiver that will allow it to keep hiring and handing out restricted stock without public disclosure. The SEC granted the request on Oct. 14. That will help the company reach 800 employees by the end of the year, up from 400 at the close of 2007.

The company is even reducing its revenue goals to pull in more users. In January, founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg said Facebook was shooting for revenues of $300 million to $350 million this year. But this spring, Zuckerberg and his board lowered the revenue target to $250 million to $300 million, say sources familiar with company finances. Thiel says engineers were shifted away from ad programs to concentrate on fresh features, languages, and other projects that will boost user growth. Even as the economy has weakened in recent months, Facebook has decided to stick with its spend-now, profit-later approach. "We still think it's a land grab where we have to try to get to scale first," says Thiel.

It's a gutsy strategy, increasingly rare in Silicon Valley. Last month, prominent venture firm Sequoia Capital gave a presentation to its startups titled "R.I.P. Good Times," which argued that companies must cut costs fast to survive. One Power Point slide included a skull-and-crossbones and the words "death spiral" to show the likely fate of startups that fail to come to grips with the new reality. The Sequoia view has become accepted wisdom among Valley venture capitalists, leading to layoffs at scores of companies.

Facebook isn't yet profitable. But Thiel says the company can afford to be aggressive. It has raised about $500 million and is "slightly cash-flow negative," Thiel says. At its current burn rate, he says, the company has enough cash for three or four years. "If we stopped growing, we could make money, but it makes no sense for us to stop growing," he says.

Facebook's strategy stands in contrast to that of rival MySpace (NWS). Part of Rupert Murdoch's publicly traded News Corp. (NWS), MySpace has dialed back on growth to focus on profits. Over the past year the site has expanded modestly, to 118 million users, while Facebook has more than doubled in size, to 161 million users, according to research firm comScore (SCOR).

MySpace argues that the horse race isn't that important. Travis Katz, head of international operations, says about 85% of the world's online ad spending is concentrated in five markets—the U.S., Britain, Japan, Germany, and France—and in those markets, MySpace is 30% larger than any competitor. That's one reason MySpace, though smaller in number of users, will generate an estimated $606 million in revenues this year, according to Goldman Sachs, (GS) more than twice Facebook's revenues. "We're not worried about rolling out in every single country," says Katz.

Facebook may not reach every country, but top executives like Zuckerberg give the impression they would like to. A social-networking site that can connect people with friends in Saudi Arabia or the Philippines or Tonga, they say, is simply more valuable than one that can't. Chief Financial Officer Gideon Yu says he is actively looking for deals to expand the company's reach. Top options could include sites in Brazil, Germany, India, or Japan, where Facebook does not have a strong presence. "If there's a way for us to acquire a geography or a demographic, it may be prudent to go off and buy it," says Yu.

At the same time, Facebook needs to figure out a sustainable business model. All the focus on expansion means Zuckerberg and Sandberg will have to do so in the face of a nasty downturn. Companies typically cut ad spending during recessions, especially for newer forms of ads, such as those on social-networking Web sites. "The first things to go are experimental ads," says Debra Aho Williamson, an analyst at research firm eMarketer.
VIRTUAL GIFTS

Facebook hopes to make money in three ways. Online advertising is far and away the most important, accounting for an estimated $200 million to $225 million in revenues this year. The company is also selling digital goods—electronic versions of guitars, flowers, and the like that Facebook friends give each other. Charging $1 apiece for these goods will generate $30 million to $40 million this year, estimates venture capitalist Jeremy Liew.

The third leg of Facebook's business may be the most controversial. The company is seriously considering a plan to take a cut of money from the software developers who create applications for the site. These startups make software people use on Facebook to discover new music, play games, or share slide shows. Vice-President Chamath Palihapitiya, disclosing the initiative for the first time, says the company may be able to help these startups generate more cash from advertising or e-commerce and then take a slice of that revenue. "Over the next few years, I bet we will create a very meaningful revenue model," he says. Developers already have a delicate relationship with Facebook, though, so any grab for a piece of their revenues could prove contentious.

Facebook is counting on Sandberg to make all this work. The former Google (GOOG) sales executive played a key role in turning the search giant into one of the most profitable companies in the world. Adam Freed, who used to work at Google for Sandberg, says she's both demanding and supportive. He recalls working on a presentation to set up a Google office in Dublin and having Sandberg tell him it wasn't good enough. After making suggestions, she ultimately took over Freed's computer keyboard to help him find the right words. "She was tough on me to allow me to grow," he says.
INTERACTIVE ADS

Facebook and Sandberg are working on ways to move beyond traditional online ads—the text and pictorial banners that show up on most Web sites. They believe that only by offering something truly different, as Google did, can Facebook stand out among the many sites on the Web. One example came in August when Facebook began rolling out what it calls "engagement ads." Whereas most online ads are like billboards trumpeting a slogan, engagement ads are more like digital bulletin boards, encouraging users to respond to the pitches by commenting, sharing virtual gifts, or becoming fans of the ads themselves. Some of the trial efforts have taken off. An engagement ad for Paramount Pictures' Tropic Thunder, including a trailer for the movie, generated 30,000 comments from Facebook users. "I laughed so hard I couldn't breathe," wrote one fan.

A service set to launch this winter, called Facebook Connect, will bring social-networking capabilities to CNN, CBS, and other Web sites and could make advertising more relevant to Web surfers. The service tracks what people search for on the Net and what kinds of sites they visit. If Facebook learns that you frequent food sites, for instance, it could serve up an ad for a subscription to Gourmet magazine. To support these efforts, Facebook is more than doubling its salesforce, to 130. The team will complement the 400 salespeople at Microsoft (MSFT) responsible for selling Facebook's traditional display ads.

The company is making progress in attracting deep-pocketed advertisers—one reason revenues will as much as double from last year's $150 million. Clients include Blockbuster, Mazda, and Ben & Jerry's. Katie O'Brien, digital marketing manager for the Vermont ice cream maker, says her ad campaign this spring went better than expected. When the company let Facebook users give each other virtual ice cream cones, it anticipated hitting 250,000 cones. Instead, it gave away twice that number of icons. "It created good brand awareness and buzz," she says.

Still, O'Brien says social networks have yet to become a core part of Ben & Jerry's marketing. The company spends most of its digital ad budget on search-engine marketing and its own Web site. Social-network ads don't have the same track record, she says, and are time-consuming to create. For Facebook to become more successful on Madison Avenue, O'Brien and other marketers say, the company needs to make it easier to develop, automate, and manage ad campaigns. "Social networking has been fun," she says. But it will "probably take another successful year" for it to become essential.

Such skepticism doesn't faze Sandberg. Facebook, she says, is in this for the long haul. That's why it's so determined to forge ahead, even as others succumb to the slowing economy. "We are in a new industry," she says. "We are figuring it out."

Complete article here.

68% of advertisers say they plan to increase their ad spending online


This article is very interesting. Here are the results of a survey done do anticipate the reactions of advertisers regarding the current financial crisis.

The conclusion is that Marketers will Cut Back on traditional media (Broadcast TV, Magazines and National Newspapers) and they will increase their spending in Online and Mobile in the Next 6 Months.

By Michael Bush

Published: November 19, 2008
NEW YORK (AdAge.com) -- Over the next six months, not only will ad spending be down, but the feeling among advertisers and their agencies toward media such as broadcast TV, national newspapers and magazines is growing more pessimistic. The dreary outlook is courtesy of the new Advertiser Optimism Report by Advertiser Perceptions.

The latest Advertiser Optimism Report by Advertiser Perceptions. Click to enlarge.
But while the outlook is somewhat bleak for the aforementioned ad media, others like online, cable TV and mobile are likely to attract more of marketers' money.

The report shows a large percentage of the advertisers polled (68%) said they plan to increase their ad spending online. Still, that number is down four points from 72% six months ago. The numbers were also slightly down for cable TV (27% vs. 28%) and mobile (51% vs. 53%) over that same period but remained on the "optimistic" side of the scale.

Advertisers were more pessimistic on broadcast TV, with only 16% saying they would increase their ad spending on broadcast. That is down from the 22% who said they planned to increase their broadcast TV budget a year ago, and only slightly better than the 14% who were planning to increase their broadcast spending six months ago. National newspapers, which were already low six months ago at 10%, dropped into the single digits at 9%, while magazines saw a more drastic drop from 22% to 18% over the same time period.

Accountability
"We're seeing less slowing in media that's more accountable and targetable," said Randy Cohen, principal at Advertiser Perceptions. "We still see less optimism for online and for cable TV, but it's more severe in the media that tends to be less accountable."

From the agency perspective, optimism for the online space is down seven points from six months ago but is still quite high, with 67% saying they plan to increase their online spending. The report showed that fewer agencies planned on increasing ad spending on cable TV (27% vs. 30%) and mobile (50% vs. 54%) than six months ago, but that they were still optimistic about those media. The same couldn't be said for broadcast TV (13% vs. 17%), magazines (18% vs. 21%) and national newspapers (8% vs. 7%).

Download the pdf survey results here

However, the number of media brands being considered over the next six months by all who took part in the report is up. The number of online media brands being considered jumped from 14 to 18, TV brands from 21 to 22 and even print brands increased from 11 to 13. In fact, the number of media brands considered by ad category increased for all except the categories home and appliance, technology and telecommunications. And the number of media brands that advertisers and their agencies have committed to over the next six months in the online (seven vs. four) and print (five vs. four) spaces are both up as well, which indicates that less money is being spread across more media brands. The number of TV brands remained constant at eight over the last six months.

The report also reinforces that it is the results that are most significant to marketers and agencies, even more so than cost. Whether it's an online, TV or print media buy, the ad results are what matters most to marketers and their agencies. The report shows that 83% of online media decision makers believe the ad results are more important than the cost/price (50%). Nearly three quarters of TV media buyers (71%) also believe that ad results are more relevant than cost/price (62%). And a larger percentage (73%) of print decision makers are more interested in the ad results than the cost/price (53%).

Looking ahead at the next six months, the Advertiser Optimism Report projects advertiser optimism will continue to slow, taking ad spending along with it and thus creating a much more competitive media marketplace.

This also means that managing the perception of potential results and delivery for ad dollars will be vital.

Complete article on advertising age

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

Twitter passes on Facebook offer



Facebook offered a rumored $500 million in stock (based on its $15 billion valuation) to acquire Twitter, reports Kara Swisher of All Things Digital. No one went on the record to discuss the deal, but sources indicate Twitter felt it was undervalued in the deal -- especially considering the high valuation the deal put on Facebook. From the standpoint of Facebook, the acquisition of SMS-based Twitter meant taking on potentially high messaging fees from mobile providers.


The complete article here

Mobile Internet usage rises 25%



A new study by Nielsen Online has found that mobile Internet usage in the UK grew by 25 percent between the second and third quarter this year. The study - the first produced by the company's Mobile Media View service - revealed that the number of UK consumers accessing the mobile Internet rose from 5.8 million to 7.3 million in the period, while those accessing PC-based Internet usage rose by just 3 percent, from 34.3 million to 35.3 million. Mobile Internet audience also has a higher concentration of younger users than PC-based Internet, the study found, noting that 25 percent of mobile Internet consumers are aged 15-24 compared to 16 percent for PC-based consumers.

"The fact that almost seven and a half million Britons now access the Web through their phone shows that mobile Internet is fast becoming a viable way for advertisers and publishers to reach important demographic groups," said Kent Ferguson, Nielsen senior analyst. The study also found that while Google Search is the most popular PC-based Internet site, on mobile Internet BBC News is the most popular, being visited by 24 percent of UK mobile Internet consumers (1.7 million people). Other websites that were found to have a greater reach on mobile than PCs were BBC Weather (21 percent mobile, 17 percent PC-based), Sky Sports (11 percent mobile, 8 percent PC-based) and Google's Gmail (9 percent mobile, 7 percent PC-based).

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

Sorry for a few days of silence



Sorry for not having had time to update the blog these last few days. These days have been crazy:
- finalizing the launch of our second product that will be available very soon, supervising the IT team in Poland and the testing team in France and UK
- working with our Marketing VP and CFO on the preparation of the big DowJones Eurotech event for which we have been selected to present Right People as one of the most promising European start-up to key decision-makers and investors here in Silicon Valley.

Right People Investors Presentation transcription

Here is the transcription of the Right People Investors Presentation available online for our investors

Redwood City, CA – 11.18.08

Right People presenting to Investors “how to unlock and capture money from the social networks phenomena”.

This presentation is about unlocking and capturing money from online advertising through social media.



Social networks are a goldmine. Social networks are big phenomena. They have huge valuations (Facebook valued at $1.5Billion, LinkedIn valued at more than $1Billion). And that is because social networks hold the answers to what marketers and advertisers need the most: to acquire numerous new customers - and the virality of social networks is a powerful answer to this need; and to maximize their return of investments in terms of online advertising - and social networks can provide a unbeatable precision to targeted advertising. But revenues are still not as significant as expected.

There are two major issues to be solved before accessing this gold mine. The first one is the privacy issue that represents huge roadblocks to revenue generation. The second one is the doubts about social networks usefulness and longetivity.


The Privacy issue: The Facebook story is a perfect illustration at this point. Each time Facebook increases its revenues by selling more targeted profiles, new law suits arrive based of privacy breaches. Monetizing the users’ profile is a goldmine. But the problem comes from the fact that golden profile data are linked to personal confidential data. We have developed and patented a system that splits confidential data and profile data, allowing us to unlock the user’s profile monetization. We’ve solved the privacy issue.


The Usefulness issue: Right People specificity is that product development comes not only from IT technologists, but also from top sociologists. Our sociologists pinpointed the causes of the usefulness issue as follows: Social networks are about friends and friends of your friends. They are fun. But in times of crisis, social networks should be about usefulness. The principle our sociologists have transformed into a product is that if you have a problem, a question or a need, it is very likely that someone, somewhere, has already solved it. Therefore, usefulness is not about friends and friends of my friends. Usefulness is about finding the right people. And that is what Right People does. We’ve solved the usefulness issue.

We are not “yet another social network”, neither a Facebook application nor a plug-in. We do not depend on existing social networks. We are a system that helps PC and mobile phone users find the right people who can help them within their social networks.




We do more about usefulness. Not only do we help PC and mobile phone users find the right people who can help them within their social networks, but also we help them find the right people around them, in real life, meaning in an event, a conference, a hotel or resort, at a fitness center, a night club, a bar or a restaurant, while commuting, around where they live, where they work… in one world, everywhere

And we can do that because we solved the privacy issue and we do that in total control of anonymity. We can do that also because our system works on the web, but also via an iPhone, a pda, or even a vintage mobile phone via SMS text messages.

We are an established UK publicly traded company listed on NYSE-Euronext. The company has been incorporated in August 2005. We went through IPO 3 years later in August 2008. We are at the product delivery version 2, as we launched our first two products in the past weeks.



Our targeted customers are the Fortune 1000 companies.
Our first source of revenues is Right People Pro, customizing our viral technology for brands, helping them expand and strengthen their customers’ base by bringing to their customers the value of others around them.
Our second source of revenues is Right People Targeted Self-Service Advertising propelling targeted sponsored links, on the same business model than Google.



Our road to profitability brings our first $1Million of revenues in Q1 2009, and our first $10Million of revenues and profitability for Q2 2010.

Investing early in Right People is still available for a short period of time at the IPO introduction price while the current stock price has doubled in a few weeks.

Institutional and qualified private investors may now invest for a short period of time at a privileged stock price.



All information on "How to invest early in Right People" here
or contact bertrandgerard@rightpeople.mobi who is in charge of investors' relations.



Full pdf version download here

Monday, November 10, 2008

Welcoming our Sales VP in Palo Alto


CEO and COO welcoming our Sales VP for his first day at Right People in Palo Alto

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

Right People for the new elected President



The Right People Team also spent their night waiting for the results of the elections.

Two versions of "Right People for the President" were ready to be switched on:
- one in case of a victory from Obama
- one for McCain.

All our teams were asked to remain neutral during the campaign and as long as the results were not officialy disclosed.
So we did. So did I.

Now that the winner has been declared, I can say that I am happy that Barack Obama has won for 3 reasons:
- first, because he has won thanks to the tremendous use of Internet and social networks. My next post tells you the story of Obama and social networks. His victory is a powerful illustration of how social networks will shape our day-to-day life in the future. And I am proud to run Right People Technologies which has developped and patented the greatest technology in terms of social interactions.
- second, because I share most of his vision of the world and I wish him the best for his 4-year mandate.
- and third, because of mother nature: lately, and since the beginning of the campaign, there hasn't been one day when people didn't stop me on the street and tell me 'you know what? you really do look a lot like Obama!'

:)

Obama election results speech

As Right People took part in helping the new president, this speech is worth a look.

The world is watching...



Today is D-Day.
Every American citizen knows what he/she has to do... and we stand watching....

How Obama Really Did It using Social Networks

The social-networking strategy that took an obscure senator to the doors of the White House.
Web Jockey: Jascha Franklin-Hodge, the 29-year-old cofounder and chief technology officer of Blue State Digital, the company behind Obama’s social technologies, says that “on every metric, this campaign has operated on a scale that has exceeded what was done before.” Beyond fund-raising, the Web tools enabled event planning, phone banks, and targeted e-mailing. Credit: Porter Gifford
Multimedia

Jascha Franklin-Hodge talks about his company’s work with Barack Obama’s online social network.

View photos of parties organized through Obama’s social-networking site.
Joe Trippi, Howard Dean's 2004 presidential campaign manager and Internet impresario, describes Super Tuesday II--the March 4 primaries in Texas, Ohio, Vermont, and Rhode Island--as the moment Barack Obama used social tech­nology to decisive effect. The day's largest hoard of dele­gates would be contested in Texas, where a strong showing would require exceptional discipline and voter-education efforts. In Texas, Democrats vote first at the polls and then, if they choose, again at caucuses after the polls close. The caucuses award one-third of the Democratic delegates.
Hillary Clinton's camp had about 20,000 volunteers at work in Texas. But in an e-mail, Trippi learned that 104,000 Texans had joined Obama's social-­networking site, www.my.barackobama.com, known as MyBO. MyBO and the main Obama site had already logged their share of achievements, particularly in helping rake in cash. The month before, the freshman senator from Illinois had set a record in American politics by garnering $55 million in donations in a single month. In Texas, MyBO also gave the Obama team the instant capacity to wage fully networked campaign warfare. After seeing the volunteer numbers, Trippi says, "I remember saying, 'Game, match--it's over.'"
The Obama campaign could get marching orders to the Texans registered with MyBO with minimal effort. The MyBO databases could slice and dice lists of volunteers by geographic micro­region and pair people with appropriate tasks, including prepping nearby voters on caucus procedure. "You could go online and download the names, addresses, and phone numbers of 100 people in your neighborhood to get out and vote--or the 40 people on your block who were undecided," Trippi says. "'Here is the leaflet: print it out and get it to them.' It was you, at your computer, in your house, printing and downloading. They did it all very well." Clinton won the Texas primary vote 51 to 47 percent. But Obama's ­people, following their MyBO playbook, so overwhelmed the chaotic, crowded caucuses that he scored an overall victory in the Texas delegate count, 99 to 94. His showing nearly canceled out ­Clinton's win that day in Ohio. Clinton lost her last major opportunity to stop the Obama juggernaut. "In 1992, Carville said, 'It's the economy, stupid,'" Trippi says, recalling the exhortation of Bill Clinton's campaign manager, James Carville. "This year, it was the network, stupid!"
Throughout the political season, the Obama campaign has domi­nated new media, capitalizing on a confluence of trends. Americans are more able to access media-rich content online; 55 percent have broadband Internet connections at home, double the figure for spring 2004. Social-networking technologies have matured, and more Americans are comfortable with them. Although the 2004 Dean campaign broke ground with its online meeting technologies and blogging, "people didn't quite have the facility," says ­Lawrence Lessig, a Stanford law professor who has given the Obama campaign Internet policy advice (Lessig wrote The People Own Ideas! in our May/June 2005 issue). "The world has now caught up with the technology." The Obama campaign, he adds, recognized this early: "The key networking advance in the Obama field operation was really deploying community­-building tools in a smart way from the very beginning."
Of course, many of the 2008 candidates had websites, click-to-donate tools, and social-networking features--even John McCain, who does not personally use e-mail. But the Obama team put such technologies at the center of its campaign--among other things, recruiting 24-year-old Chris Hughes, cofounder of Facebook, to help develop them. And it managed those tools well. Supporters had considerable discretion to use MyBO to organize on their own; the campaign did not micromanage but struck a balance between top-down control and anarchy. In short, Obama, the former Chicago community organizer, created the ultimate online political machine.
The Obama campaign did not provide access or interviews for this story; it only confirmed some details of our reporting and offered written comments. This story is based on interviews with third parties involved in developing Obama's social-networking strategy or who were familiar with it, and on public records.


An Online Nervous SystemA row of elegant, renovated 19th-century industrial buildings lines Boston's Congress Street east of Fort Point Channel. On any given day, behind a plain wooden door on the third floor of 374 Congress, 15 to 20 casually clad programmers tap away at computers. On the day I visited, the strains of Creedence Clearwater Revival filled the room; a Ping-Pong table dominated the small kitchen. This is the technology center for Blue State Digital, which means that it is also the nervous system for its two largest clients, the Barack Obama campaign and the Democratic National Committee. Founded by alumni of the Dean campaign, Blue State Digital added interactive elements to Obama's website--including MyBO--and now tends to its daily care and feeding. The site's servers hum away in a Boston suburb and are backed up in the Chicago area.
Jascha Franklin-Hodge, 29, greeted me with a friendly handshake and a gap-toothed grin. He has a deep voice and a hearty laugh; his face is ringed by a narrow beard. Franklin-Hodge dropped out of MIT after his freshman year and spent a few years in online music startups before running the Internet infrastructure for the Dean campaign, which received a then-­unprecedented $27 million in online donations. "When the campaign ended, we thought, 'Howard Dean was not destined to be president, but what we are doing online--this is too big to let go away,'" he says. He and three others cofounded Blue State Digital, where he is chief technology officer. (Another cofounder, Joe Rospars, is now on leave with the Obama campaign as its new-media director.)
The MyBO tools are, in essence, rebuilt and consolidated versions of those created for the Dean campaign. Dean's website allowed supporters to donate money, organize meetings, and distribute media, says Zephyr Teachout, who was Dean's Internet director and is now a visiting law professor at Duke University. "We developed all the tools the Obama campaign is using: SMS [text messaging], phone tools, Web capacity," Teachout recalls. "They [Blue State Digital] did a lot of nice work in taking this crude set of unrelated applications and making a complete suite."
Blue State Digital had nine days to add its tools to Obama's site before the senator announced his candidacy on February 10, 2007, in Springfield, IL. Among other preparations, the team braced for heavy traffic. "We made some projections of traffic levels, contribution amounts, and e-mail levels based on estimates from folks who worked with [John] Kerry and Dean in 2004," recalls Franklin­-Hodge. As Obama's Springfield speech progressed, "we were watching the traffic go up and up, surpassing all our previous records." (He would not provide specific numbers.) It was clear that early assumptions were low. "We blew through all of those [estimates] in February," he says. "So we had to do a lot of work to make sure we kept up with the demand his online success had placed on the system." By July 2008, the campaign had raised more than $200 million from more than a million online donors (Obama had raised $340 million from all sources by the end of June), and MyBO had logged more than a million user accounts and facilitated 75,000 local events, according to Blue State Digital.
MyBO and the main campaign site made it easy to give money--the fuel for any campaign, because it pays for advertising and staff. Visitors could use credit cards to make one-time donations or to sign up for recurring monthly contributions. MyBO also made giving money a social event: supporters could set personal targets, run their own fund-raising efforts, and watch personal fund-­raising thermometers rise. To bring people to the site in the first place, the campaign sought to make Obama a ubiquitous presence on as many new-media platforms as possible.



Figures




New-Media King: Barack Obama’s website enjoys more hits than the competition’s, but his real dominance is on social networks like Facebook and MySpace. He’s also a leading microblogger on Twitter. Credit: Facebook and Myspace data courtesy of techpresident.com; website traffic courtesy of compete.com






The viral Internet offered myriad ways to propagate unfiltered Obama messages. The campaign posted the candidate's speeches and linked to multimedia material generated by supporters. A music video set to an Obama speech--"Yes We Can," by the hip-hop artist Will.i.am--has been posted repeatedly on YouTube, but the top two postings alone have been viewed 10 million times. A single YouTube posting of Obama's March 18 speech on race has been viewed more than four million times. Similarly, the campaign regularly sent out text messages (at Obama rallies, speakers frequently asked attendees to text their contact information to his campaign) and made sure that Obama was prominent on other social-networking sites, such as Facebook and MySpace (see "New-Media King" chart above). The campaign even used the micro­blogging service Twitter, garnering about 50,000 Obama "followers" who track his short posts. "The campaign, consciously or unconsciously, became much more of a media operation than simply a presidential campaign, because they recognized that by putting their message out onto these various platforms, their supporters would spread it for them," says Andrew Rasiej, founder of the Personal Democracy Forum, a website covering the intersection of politics and technology (and another Dean alumnus). "We are going from the era of the sound bite to the sound blast."
Money flowed in, augmenting the haul from big-ticket fund-raisers. By the time of the Iowa caucuses on January 3, 2008, the Obama campaign had more than $35 million on hand and was able to use MyBO to organize and instruct caucus-goers. "They have done a great job in being precise in the use of the tools," Teachout says. "In Iowa it was house parties, looking for a highly committed local network. In South Carolina, it was a massive get-out-the-vote effort." MyBO was critical both in the early caucus states, where campaign staff was in place, and in later-­voting states like Texas, Colorado, and Wisconsin, where "we provided the tools, remote training, and opportunity for supporters to build the campaign on their own," the Obama campaign told Technology Review in a written statement. "When the campaign eventually did deploy staff to these states, they supplemented an already-built infrastructure and volunteer network."
Using the Web, the Obama camp turbocharged age-old campaign tools. Take phone banks: through MyBO, the campaign chopped up the task of making calls into thousands of chunks small enough for a supporter to handle in an hour or two. "Millions of phone calls were made to early primary states by people who used the website to reach out and connect with them," Franklin-Hodge says. "On every metric, this campaign has operated on a scale that has exceeded what has been done before. We facilitate actions of every sort: sending e-mails out to millions and millions of people, organizing tens of thousands of events." The key, he says, is tightly integrating online activity with tasks people can perform in the real world. "Yes, there are blogs and Listservs," Franklin-Hodge says. "But the point of the campaign is to get someone to donate money, make calls, write letters, organize a house party. The core of the software is having those links to taking action--to doing something."

Pork Invaders

If the other major candidates had many of the same Web tools, their experiences show that having them isn't enough: you must make them central to the campaign and properly manage the networks of supporters they help organize. Observers say that ­Clinton's campaign deployed good tools but that online social networks and new media weren't as big a part of its strategy; at least in its early months, it relied more on conventional tactics like big fund-raisers. After all, Clinton was at the top of the party establishment. "They [the Obama supporters] are chanting 'Yes we can,' and she's saying 'I don't need you,'" Trippi says. "That is what the top of that campaign said by celebrating Terry McAuliffe [the veteran political operative and former Democratic National Committee chairman] and how many millions he could put together with big, big checks. She doesn't need my $25!" The two campaigns' fund-raising statistics support Trippi's argument: 48 percent of Obama's funds came from donations of less than $200, compared with 33 percent of Clinton's, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Clinton's Internet director, Peter Daou, credits the Obama campaign with doing an "amazing job" with its online social network. "If there is a difference in how the two campaigns approached [a Web strategy], a lot of those differences were based on our constituencies," Daou says. "We were reaching a different demographic of supporters and used our tools accordingly." For example, he says, the Clinton campaign established a presence on the baby-boomer social-networking site Eons.com, and Clinton herself often urged listeners to visit www.hillaryclinton.com. But Andrew Rasiej says that the conventional political wisdom questioned the value of the Internet. "As far as major political circles were concerned," he says, "Howard Dean failed, and therefore the Internet didn't work."
While it's hard to tease out how much Clinton's loss was due to her Web strategy--and how much to factors such as her Iraq War vote and the half-generation difference between her and Obama's ages--it seems clear that her campaign deëmphasized Web strategy early on, Trippi says. Even if you "have all the smartest bottom-up, tech-savvy people working for you," he says, "if the candidate and the top of the campaign want to run a top-down campaign, there is nothing you can do. It will sit there and nothing will happen. That's kind of what happened with the Clinton campaign."

Mc Main attitude
McCain's organization is playing to an older base of supporters. But it seems not to have grasped the breadth of recent shifts in communications technology, says David All, a Republican new-media consultant. "You have an entire generation of folks under age 25 no longer using e-mails, not even using Facebook; a majority are using text messaging," All says. "I get Obama's text messages, and every one is exactly what it should be. It is never pointless, it is always worth reading, and it has an action for you to take. You can have hundreds of recipients on a text message. You have hundreds of people trying to change the world in 160 characters or less. What's the SMS strategy for John McCain? None."
The generational differences between the Obama and McCain campaigns may be best symbolized by the distinctly retro "Pork Invaders," a game on the McCain site (it's also a Facebook application) styled after Space Invaders, the arcade game of the late 1970s. Pork Invaders allows you to fire bullets that say "veto" at slow-moving flying pigs and barrels.
But it's not that the campaign isn't trying to speak to the youth of today, as opposed to the youth of decades ago. Lately McCain has been having his daughter Meghan and two friends write a "bloggette" from the campaign trail. The bloggette site features a silhouette of a fetching woman in red high-heeled shoes. "It gives a hipper, younger perspective on the campaign and makes both of her parents seem hipper and younger," says Julie ­Germany, director of the nonpartisan Institute for Politics, Democracy, and the Internet at George Washington University. The McCain campaign did not reply to several interview requests, but Germany predicts that the campaign will exploit social networking in time to make a difference in November. "What we will see is that the McCain online campaign is using the Internet just as effectively to meet its goals as the Obama campaign," she says. Over the summer, the McCain campaign refreshed its website. But Rasiej, for one, doubts that McCain has enough time to make up lost ground.


Republican Ron Paul had a different problem: Internet anarchy. Where the Obama campaign built one central network and managed it effectively, the Paul campaign decided early on that it would essentially be a hub for whatever networks the organizers were setting up. The results were mixed. On the one hand, volunteers organized successful "money bombs"--one-day online fund-raising frenzies (the one on November 5, 2007, netted Paul $4.3 million). But sometimes the volunteers' energy--and money--was wasted, says Justine Lam, the Paul campaign's Internet director, who is now the online marketing director at Politicker.com. Consider the supporter-driven effort to hire a blimp emblazoned with "Who is Ron Paul? Google Ron Paul" to cruise up and down the East Coast last winter. "We saw all this money funding a blimp, and thought, 'We really need this money for commercials,'" Lam says. Then there is McCain, who--somewhat ironically--was the big Internet story of 2000. That year, after his New Hampshire primary victory over George W. Bush, he quickly raised $1 million online. And at times last year, he made effective use of the Internet. His staff made videos--such as "Man in the Arena," celebrating his wartime service--that gained popularity on YouTube. But the McCain site is ineffectual for social networking. In late June, when I tried to sign up on McCainSpace--the analogue to MyBO--I got error messages. When I tried again, I was informed that I would soon get a new password in my in-box. It never arrived. "His social-networking site was poorly done, and people found there was nothing to do on it," says Lam. "It was very insular, a walled garden. You don't want to keep people inside your walled garden; you want them to spread the message to new people."

A Networked White House?

The obvious next step for MyBO is to serve as a get-out-the-vote engine in November. All campaigns scrutinize public records showing who is registered to vote and whether they have voted in past elections. The Obama campaign will be able to merge this data with MyBO data. All MyBO members' activity will have been chronicled: every house party they attended, each online connection, the date and amount of each donation. Rasiej sees how it might play out: the reliable voters who signed up on MyBO but did little else may be left alone. The most active ones will be deployed to get the unreliable voters--whether MyBO members or not--to the polls. And personalized pitches can be dished up, thanks to the MyBO database. "The more contextual information they can provide the field operation, the better turnout they will have," he says.If Obama is elected, his Web-oriented campaign strategy could carry over into his presidency. He could encourage his supporters to deluge members of Congress with calls and e-mails, or use the Web to organize collective research on policy questions. The campaign said in one of its prepared statements that "it's certain that the relationships that have been built between Barack Obama and his supporters, and between supporters themselves, will not end on Election Day." But whether or not a President Obama takes MyBO into the West Wing, it's clear that the phenomenon will forever transform campaigning. "We're scratching the surface," Trippi says. "We're all excited because he's got one million people signed up--but we are 300 million people in this country. We are still at the infancy stages of what social-­networking technologies are going to do, not just in our politics but in everything. There won't be any campaign in 2012 that doesn't try to build a social network around it." Lessig warns that if Obama wins but doesn't govern according to principles of openness and change, as promised, supporters may not be so interested in serving as MyBO foot soldiers in 2012. "The thing they [the Obama camp] don't quite recognize is how much of their enormous support comes from the perception that this is someone different," Lessig says. "If they behave like everyone else, how much will that stanch the passion of his support?"



But for now, it's party time. At the end of June, after ­Clinton suspended her campaign, MyBO put out a call for the faithful to organize house parties under a "Unite for Change" theme. More than 4,000 parties were organized nationwide on June 28; I logged in and picked three parties from about a dozen in the Boston area.
My first stop was a house party in the tony suburb of ­Winchester, where several couples dutifully watched an Obama-supplied campaign video. Host Mary Hart, an art professor in her 50s, said that Obama and his website made her "open my house to strangers and really get something going." She added, "I'm e-mailing people I haven't seen in 20 years. We have this tremendous ability to use this technology to network with people. Why don't we use it?"
Next stop was a lawn party in the Boston neighborhood of Roxbury, whose organizer, Sachielle Samedi, 34, wore a button that said "Hot Chicks Dig Obama." She said that support for the Obama candidacy drew neighbors together. At the party, Wayne Dudley, a retired history professor, met a kindred spirit: Brian Murdoch, a 54-year-old Episcopal priest. The two men buttonholed me for several minutes; Dudley predicted that Obama would bring about "a new world order centered on people of integrity." Murdoch nodded vigorously. It was a fine MyBO moment.
My evening ended at a packed post-collegiate party in a Somerville walk-up apartment. Host Rebecca Herst, a 23-year-old program assistant with the Jewish Organizing Initiative, said that MyBO--unlike Facebook--allowed her to quickly upload her entire Gmail address book, grafting her network onto Obama's. "It will be interesting to see what develops after this party, because now I'm connected to all these people," she shouted over the growing din. Two beery young men, heading for the exits, handed her two checks for $20. Herst tucked the checks into her back pocket.
David Talbot is Technology Review's chief correspondent.

complete article here

Experts say that Barack Obama won the elections because he has more friends on his social networks than anyone else.



A different approach emerged in the latest presidential elections. Newly-crowned President, but then mere Democrat candidate, Barack Obama asked his party-posse: 'What are the kids down with these days, eh?' and the answer came back: 'The Internet.

So Obama decided to be EVERYWHERE on the 'net. He's on YouTube, MySpace, Facebook and so many others you won't even have heard of them. He's got a website, a blog, a TV CHANNEL and he's even made a viral video with Will.I.Am, just to make sure he ticked all the funky boxes. Let's take a look at his various profiles, and how you can add him.

Complete article here

Sunday, November 2, 2008

Photos from Right People for the President preview in Silicon Valley

We have just received the photos of the Right People for the President pre-view that occured in Silicon Valley on Sept 20th., organized by Orange Labs and Plug and Play Center, with social media guru Stowe Boyd.







That was on September 30th, 2008, at an Orange Spotlight event.
Organized by PlugandPlayTechcenter and Orange Labs on the topic "Collective Action". The power of the digital crowd, including the emergence of customer collaborations today and tomorrow was explored.

In coherence with the Orange's tagline -- "Together we can do more" -- and explore using the Spotlight format, blending startup presentations with comments from a selection of experts as part of the audience.

Stowe Boyd, the social web applications master was the coordinator and moderator.

As Stowe says about himself: "I am obsessed with social tools, and their impact on business, media, and society. I coined the term "social tools" in 1999. I am on the advisory board of Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, and other conferences. I wrote a column on social tools for Darwin in the early '00s that was fairly influential, and in the '90s I wrote a newsletter called Business Process Strategies that ranged from knowledge management to emerging Web culture, believe it or not."

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Sequoia Capital data about how online advertising resists versus traditional advertising


This chart from Sequoia Capital, a major VC in Silicon Valley explains why online advertising is a sector where the investment value is strong versus traditional advertising.


While all other markets become negative, on line advertising maintains an average +10% progression rate.

Monday, October 27, 2008

In those times, major business social network LInkedin raises funds and is valued more than 1 Billion dollars.



LinkedIn Raises $22.7 Million from Goldman Sachs, The McGraw-Hill Companies, SAP Ventures and Bessemer Venture Partners
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--LinkedIn Corporation today announced that it has secured $22.7 million in new funding from world-leading strategic investors Goldman Sachs; The McGraw-Hill Companies; and SAP Ventures, a division of SAP AG; as well as a re-investment by Bessemer Venture Partners. This financing is a follow on of the Series D fundraising round LinkedIn announced in June of 2008, in which the company raised $53 million in funding led by Bain Capital Ventures. The valuation for the Series D was just over 1 billion dollars for the $75.7 million raised.



“We secured this investment with innovators in enterprise software, investment banking and business information who see the potential to create value and transform industries through the LinkedIn platform,” said LinkedIn CEO, Dan Nye. “These leading companies understand that LinkedIn is building a network with broad and enduring value.”

Over 30 million professionals use LinkedIn to solve business problems, manage their professional relationships and control their professional identities online. LinkedIn members represent more than 170 industries, 150 countries, and include executives from all of the Fortune 500 companies. LinkedIn is currently growing at a rate of half a million new members a week. Members experience the benefits of the purpose-driven network by finding new ways to interact and do business. While standard LinkedIn accounts are free, the company earns revenue through advertising, premium subscriptions, corporate solutions, and job listings. LinkedIn recently added a new line of revenue with LinkedIn Surveys.

“SAP Ventures is extremely excited to partner with one of the leading Internet companies in the world,” said Doug Higgins, partner at SAP Ventures. “We made this investment because we believe that when Web 2.0 technologies are thoughtfully applied to the enterprise, they can produce significant efficiencies for small, medium and large companies.”

“We are delighted to enhance our strategic partnership with LinkedIn, which helps BusinessWeek readers network with others and provides LinkedIn users with broader access to content,” said Glenn S. Goldberg, president of Information & Media for The McGraw-Hill Companies. “We look forward to developing additional opportunities to connect business professionals and to serve their information needs through BusinessWeek and our other respected franchises.”

"In today's economy we spend more time tending to our professional networks, and so it's no surprise that LinkedIn continues to grow in membership and engagement,” said David Cowan, partner at Bessemer Venture Partners.

Complete article here

Sunday, October 26, 2008

Weekends at Right People



As we are preparing the launch of our second product very soon, here is what weekends look like at RightPeople
:)

I enjoy watching this team work with passion.
Right People has become their lives.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Right People Technologies has been selected for the "Best of Breed CEO Showcases"



We are proud to announce that Right People Technologies will be presented as one of the "Best of Breed CEO Showcases" in Silicon Valley on Dec 2nd and 3rd, 2008.

It is very important to us to validate that the IT Silicon Valley environment welcomes us for the second time with such an award.

Venture Summit Silicon Valley is a two-day gathering that highlights the significant economic, political and technology trends impacting the global growth investor. Venture Summit features the most influential institutional investors, venture capitalists, corporate buyers, investment bankers and research analysts in keynote presentations and panel debates. The Venture Summit will also host 14 “Best of Breed CEO Showcases” handpicked from the AlwaysOn annual top 100 private company list, and 36 other qualified six-minute CEO pitches from companies seeking later-stage capital or potential acquirers.

The Venture Summit’s goal is to match growth company buyers and sellers and identify the most promising innovation-driven, growth investment opportunities. At the Venture Summit, our editors will also honor the “AO Deal Maker 100” and the annual “AO Industry Analyst All-Star Team.”

Who will be attending:
Five hundred institutional investors, venture capitalists, investment bankers, research analysts and corporate buyers will attend Venture Summit Silicon Valley. The most influential members of the financial and technology media and blogging community will also be on hand to moderate debates and cover the action. Executives attend Venture Summit Silicon Valley to identify and debate emerging investment opportunities in venture and private equity funds and private growth companies, and to build high-level relationships with technology and greentech CEOs and corporate buyers

Wednesday, October 22, 2008

Social networks are among the Top 10 Strategic Technologies Gartner Identifies for 2009



October 14, 2008 — Gartner, Inc. analysts today highlighted the top 10 technologies and trends that will be strategic for most organizations. The analysts presented their findings during Gartner Symposium/ITxpo, being held here through October 16.

Gartner defines a strategic technology as one with the potential for significant impact on the enterprise in the next three years. Factors that denote significant impact include a high potential for disruption to IT or the business, the need for a major dollar investment, or the risk of being late to adopt.

These technologies impact the organization's long-term plans, programs and initiatives. They may be strategic because they have matured to broad market use or because they enable strategic advantage from early adoption.

“Strategic technologies affect, run, grow and transform the business initiatives of an organization,” said David Cearley, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. “Companies should look at these 10 opportunities and evaluate where these technologies can add value to their business services and solutions, as well as develop a process for detecting and evaluating the business value of new technologies as they enter the market.”

The top 10 strategic technologies for 2009 include:

Virtualization. Much of the current buzz is focused on server virtualization, but virtualization in storage and client devices is also moving rapidly. Virtualization to eliminate duplicate copies of data on the real storage devices while maintaining the illusion to the accessing systems that the files are as originally stored (data deduplication) can significantly decrease the cost of storage devices and media to hold information. Hosted virtual images deliver a near-identical result to blade-based PCs. But, instead of the motherboard function being located in the data center as hardware, it is located there as a virtual machine bubble. However, despite ambitious deployment plans from many organizations, deployments of hosted virtual desktop capabilities will be adopted by fewer than 40 percent of target users by 2010.

Cloud Computing. Cloud computing is a style of computing that characterizes a model in which providers deliver a variety of IT-enabled capabilities to consumers. They key characteristics of cloud computing are 1) delivery of capabilities “as a service,” 2) delivery of services in a highly scalable and elastic fashion, 3) using Internet technologies and techniques to develop and deliver the services, and 4) designing for delivery to external customers. Although cost is a potential benefit for small companies, the biggest benefits are the built-in elasticity and scalability, which not only reduce barriers to entry, but also enable these companies to grow quickly. As certain IT functions are industrializing and becoming less customized, there are more possibilities for larger organizations to benefit from cloud computing.

Servers — Beyond Blades. Servers are evolving beyond the blade server stage that exists today. This evolution will simplify the provisioning of capacity to meet growing needs. The organization tracks the various resource types, for example, memory, separately and replenishes only the type that is in short supply. This eliminates the need to pay for all three resource types to upgrade capacity. It also simplifies the inventory of systems, eliminating the need to track and purchase various sizes and configurations. The result will be higher utilization because of lessened “waste” of resources that are in the wrong configuration or that come along with the needed processors and memory in a fixed bundle.

Web-Oriented Architectures. The Internet is arguably the best example of an agile, interoperable and scalable service-oriented environment in existence. This level of flexibility is achieved because of key design principles inherent in the Internet/Web approach, as well as the emergence of Web-centric technologies and standards that promote these principles. The use of Web-centric models to build global-class solutions cannot address the full breadth of enterprise computing needs. However, Gartner expects that continued evolution of the Web-centric approach will enable its use in an ever-broadening set of enterprise solutions during the next five years.

EnterpriseMashups. Enterprises are now investigating taking mashups from cool Web hobby to enterprise-class systems to augment their models for delivering and managing applications. Through 2010, the enterprise mashup product environment will experience significant flux and consolidation, and application architects and IT leaders should investigate this growing space for the significant and transformational potential it may offer their enterprises.

Specialized Systems. Appliances have been used to accomplish IT purposes, but only with a few classes of function have appliances prevailed. Heterogeneous systems are an emerging trend in high-performance computing to address the requirements of the most demanding workloads, and this approach will eventually reach the general-purpose computing market. Heterogeneous systems are also specialized systems with the same single-purpose imitations of appliances, but the heterogeneous system is a server system into which the owner installs software to accomplish its function.



Social Software and Social Networking. Social software includes a broad range of technologies, such as social networking, social collaboration, social media and social validation. Organizations should consider adding a social dimension to a conventional Web site or application and should adopt a social platform sooner, rather than later, because the greatest risk lies in failure to engage and thereby, being left mute in a dialogue where your voice must be heard.

Unified Communications. During the next five years, the number of different communications vendors with which a typical organization works with will be reduced by at least 50 percent. This change is driven by increases in the capability of application servers and the general shift of communications applications to common off-the-shelf server and operating systems. As this occurs, formerly distinct markets, each with distinct vendors, converge, resulting in massive consolidation in the communications industry. Organizations must build careful, detailed plans for when each category of communications function is replaced or converged, coupling this step with the prior completion of appropriate administrative team convergence.

Business Intelligence. Business Intelligence (BI), the top technology priority in Gartner’s 2008 CIO survey, can have a direct positive impact on a company’s business performance, dramatically improving its ability to accomplish its mission by making smarter decisions at every level of the business from corporate strategy to operational processes. BI is particularly strategic because it is directed toward business managers and knowledge workers who make up the pool of thinkers and decision makers that are tasked with running, growing and transforming the business. Tools that let these users make faster, better and more-informed decisions are particularly valuable in a difficult business environment.

Green IT. Shifting to more efficient products and approaches can allow for more equipment to fit within an energy footprint, or to fit into a previously filled center. Regulations are multiplying and have the potential to seriously constrain companies in building data centers, as the effect of power grids, carbon emissions from increased use and other environmental impacts are under scrutiny. Organizations should consider regulations and have alternative plans for data center and capacity growth.

“A strategic technology may be an existing technology that has matured and/or become suitable for a wider range of uses,” said Carl Claunch, vice president and distinguished analyst at Gartner. “It may also be an emerging technology that offers an opportunity for strategic business advantage for early adopters or with potential for significant market disruption in the next five years. Companies should evaluate these technologies and adjust based on their industry need, unique business needs, technology adoption model and other factors.”



complete article here

Virality of Right People for the president



It is interesting to look at the propagation of Right People for the President.
Here is, hour after hour, the number of indexations on Google of "Right People for the President" (having the words between coma means that this is regarding our specific product for the elections).



00:00 O indexation
01:00 3 indexations
02:00 5 indexations
06:00 12 indexations
09:00 92 indexations
12:00 115 indexations
10 days later: 34300 indexations


In terms of connections
00:00 O connections per day
Day 1: 43 connections per day
Day 2: 882 connections per day
Day 3: 3071 connections per day
DAy 5: 12710 connections per day
Day 6: 48473 connections per day
10 days later: 213921 connections per day

Our ability to unlock virality in blogs

Here is what Right People for the president looks like in blogs

Third Full Presidential Debate Obama vs Mccain

As Right People is now taking part in helping the presidential candidates, this final presidential debate was of great interest.

Friday, October 17, 2008

Google just demonstrated that advertising online seems to be safe from the current crisis



Although Google stock has temporarily decreased as any stock during the last weeks because of the financial crisis, Google has just released its quarter report showing that fundamentals are better and better. For investors looking for real long-term value this is a sign of the potential profits behind advertising online, despite any global or temporary crisis.



For months, Google has promised investors that the company’s online advertising system would do relatively well in an economic downturn. On Thursday, it showed evidence that it may be able to deliver on that promise.

Google said that its growth rate continued to slow in the third quarter. But the company fared better than Wall Street expected as it reported a solid 26 percent jump in net income to $1.35 billion, or $4.24 a share, from $1.07 billion in the third quarter of 2007. The company’s results were bolstered by strong gains in online advertising and efforts by Google to slow hiring and rein in costs.

Google’s shares, which rose to $353.02, or 4 percent, in regular trading on Thursday, jumped another 10 percent after the company reported its financial results. However, they remain down sharply from their high of just over $740 last November.

Google’s chief executive, Eric E. Schmidt, said the results reflected marketers’ acceptance of a system that is better and more measurable than other forms of advertising. He said that while the economic environment was unpredictable, Google was poised to continue doing relatively well.

“We are very realistic about the macroeconomic climate, but we are optimistic about Google’s future,” Mr. Schmidt said during a conference call with analysts.

While Google is the largest seller of online ads, its relatively strong results are not indicative of the overall health of the Internet advertising business. Google relies primarily on search ads, the fastest-growing segment of the market. Since marketers use such ads to lure people to their Web sites, analysts say they believe they are among the last thing advertisers would cut during a recession.

Google said revenue for the third quarter, which ended Sept. 30, grew 31 percent, to $5.54 billion, up from $4.23 billion a year earlier. The growth rate is a further indication that Google’s business is maturing. The company’s revenue grew 56 percent in 2007 and 73 percent in 2006.

Google’s net revenue, which excludes commissions paid to advertising partners, rose to $4.04 billion, roughly in line with the $4.05 billion that analysts expected. The company beat Wall Street’s profit expectations. Excluding the cost of stock options and other items, Google’s income was $4.92 a share, higher than the $4.79 a share forecast by analysts.

“This is the first quarter when the wheels are coming off the wagon on the economy and they’ve been able to have a decent quarter,” said Youssef H. Squali, an analyst with Jefferies & Company. “Google’s business model has proven to be better than that of your typical Internet company because of its focus on performance.”

complete article here


Personal comment: We share these view from market analysts about the future of advertising online, and when top analyst H.Squali says that "“Google’s business model has proven to be better than that of your typical Internet company", I am pleased that Right People's business model is strictly the same though applied to people search, rather than information search.

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Checking the load balancing



On D-Day of launching of the President, CEO, CTO, Chief Analyst, Chief of Integration, watching the load balancing simulation algorythms.

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

Right People reveals today the first technology that unleashes the “wisdom of the crowds”, in favor of the next President of the United States!



Right People launches today the first technology that unleashes the “wisdom of the crowds”, in favor of the next President of the United States. Right People Technologies is bringing a new twist to the American presidential elections with “Right People for the President”, a website that will enable web users to help their favorite candidate win the elections. The technology used by Right People will give the candidates direct feedback from the American voters, with ideas and contributions on strategic campaign issues. A new way for the people to make their voices heard by the future President.

Dan Ake, Right People CEO explains: “We created Right People for the President because people want to be part of the presidential elections - especially the 2008 edition - , because people want more and more to speak up and be listened to. Regular blog comments do not give them the satisfaction of being useful enough. We are very excited to help the people to be heard.”

This brand new application from Right People’s search platform is now available online at http://www.rightpeopleforthepresident.com/ , through a dedicated website as well as numerous political sites and blogs. Beyond the elections, everyone should have the opportunity to help the next President of the US on his policies both at federal and local level.



A viral technology to involve potential voters
The technology used by Right People for the President gives voters an answer to their need for an arena of expression, encouraging them to get involved and not stay passive during the elections process. Right People for the President gives voters a compelling reason to engage their community of friends to support them and their candidate. The motivation to have a suggestion forwarded to the candidate, along with your picture, encourages a viral usage of the Right People player.

A viral technology to involve media and bloggers
Right People for the President can be inserted in a website or a blog in an easy copy-and-paste procedure. It gives bloggers a way to reinforce their influence, and an efficient way for their readers to be active regarding the elections. It gives them a compelling reason to engage their community of readers to support the candidate of their choice. The motivation to have a suggestion coming from their blog forwarded to the candidate encourages a viral usage of the Right People player.


« Right People for the President » is a ground breaking first in the history of the American elections; it brings forward the social media technology as a new tool for democracy.


Complete press release here

Right People for the President in every blog

Right People for Obama ...


or Right People for McCain...


If you are a blogger, just click on "ADD TO A BLOG" and the Right People for the President's player will be in your blog in 1 second.

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Full Vice Pesidential Debate Palin vs Biden

Since Right People will be helping the presidential candidates very soon, this vice presidential debate is of great interest.

Saturday, October 4, 2008

House approves historic bailout bill

A we are listed, we are concerned by the stock-exchange issue and we are quite satisfied that the US government has come to a nationwide agreement.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi holds a copy of the financial bailout bill as she savors the moment with fellow Democratic Reps. (from left) Barney Frank, James Clyburn and Steny Hoyer after the House passed the legislation 263-171.



In four long days, as credit markets froze, Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama worked the phones with President Bush. California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger leaned on the California congressional delegation. The chairmen of General Motors and Chrysler allied with the small-town car dealer and banker in a full-court press on Congress. And in the end, they helped House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat from San Francisco, engineer the biggest bailout of the banking system in U.S. history.

The overwhelming 263-171 House vote for the $700 billion rescue erased a stunning defeat Monday that shocked Pelosi and her GOP counterpart, Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio. That defeat, and fear that inaction would lead to a once-in-a-century style economic collapse, set in motion the most extraordinary political alliance witnessed in modern times.

The nation's top leaders quickly rallied their combined forces behind an unprecedented and deeply unpopular government intervention in the U.S. economy, one that offended much of the public and the ideological wings of both parties just one month before a presidential election.

complete article here

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Full Presidential Debate Obama vs Mccain

As Rigt People will help the presidential candidates very soon, this presidential debate if of great interest.